Click here for AnswerPool.com Home page




Google

    AnswerPool.com  Hop To Forum Categories  Travel  Hop To Forums  Destinations    Grand Canyon
Go
Post
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Enthusiast
Picture of Fourbrick2
Posted
Just seen pictures of the new Glass walkway that juts out over the Grand Canyon. The public can walk out to give themselves the thrill of looking down 2000 feet, through the glass floor.

Who on earth allowed the promoters to desecrate one of the wonders of the world just to earn a few bucks? Is there nothing sacred?
 
Posts: 273 | Location: Southport, U.K. | Registered: 07-05-04Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond Enthusiast

Picture of Elexina
Posted Hide Post
I guess there’s a pretty big controversy about this raging, I saw something on CNN the other morning. Isn’t it a little late to be all riled up about it? Why didn’t we hear the about the protests when it was proposed and/or under construction?
 
Posts: 4412 | Location: Rochester, NY, USA | Registered: 06-03-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond
Enthusiast

Picture of frankvan
Posted Hide Post
I suppose it's hard to object to the Hualapai tribe, who own the land, building such a fine source of income on their reservation. Didn't we give them that land in compensation for taking the whole damn continent away from them???? Confused
 
Posts: 6699 | Location: Baltimore, MD, U.S.A | Registered: 06-03-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
dg
Gold Enthusiast
Picture of dg
Posted Hide Post
I know, isn't it hideous?

Hey, maybe Niagra Falls was unspoilt once too?

Grand Canyon Walkway
 
Posts: 2274 | Location: Ontario, Canada | Registered: 10-27-06Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond Enthusiast

Posted Hide Post
Wonder if they've made particular plans for rapid response to the effects of sphincter loosening in some who look down.
 
Posts: 1505 | Location: Puget Sound, USA | Registered: 06-03-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Silver
Enthusiast
Posted Hide Post
Hi Sid:

Yep...they're planning to put in a Slip'N'Slide for just that purpose.

hippolips
 
Posts: 795 | Location: Temecula,CA,USA | Registered: 06-03-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Gold
Enthusiast
Picture of VelvetVoice
Posted Hide Post
I think it would be great to see the Grand Canyon that way. It would be a lot cheaper and more environmentally friendly. And it's not as financially draining as the Indian casinos here in the Northeast.
 
Posts: 1197 | Location: Connecticut, USA | Registered: 06-04-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Koz
Diamond
Enthusiast

Posted Hide Post
quote:
I know, isn't it hideous?


I disagree dg, I think it is beautiful. Cool

I heard about this last year, and saw it on television the other night. My wife saw the sheer glee on my face and commented that she will wait for me on safe ground while I check it out. The views must be spectacular Big Grin !

We have always wanted to go to the Grand Canyon, and now this gives me more of a reason. We are thinking of going this summer.

Oh, Fourbrick I believe it is about 2,000 meters (3,939 feet) straight down to the Colorado River . Appropriate that Astronaut Buzz Aldrin took the first ceremonial step out the other day. At least he knows how to fly Wink .
 
Posts: 3632 | Location: Long Island, New York USA | Registered: 06-03-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Platinum
Enthusiast
Posted Hide Post
As a tourist observatory I wouldn't call it hideous -- it's a high-tech and aesthetically pleasing design. I'm sure it's a very cool experience (though Buzz Aldrin brought the media down to earth by commenting that it was "not exactly like floating on air"). No doubt it is, or soon will be, shamelessly commercial and exploitive: Exit thru the gift shop, etc. But I share frankvan's sentiment about there being nothing wrong with American Indians making a few bucks from it.
 
Posts: 1911 | Location: U.S. | Registered: 06-03-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond
Enthusiast

Posted Hide Post
quote:
2,000 meters (3,939 feet)

There's something off there, and I think it's the meters measurement. The round number they've been giving is 4000 feet, which is 1219 meters.
 
Posts: 5888 | Location: Indiana | Registered: 06-13-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond
Enthusiast

Picture of aminator2002
Posted Hide Post
It's quite a structure and I'm a little unsure how effective it will be. The supports are so large that you really don't get a clear view below as the original design drawing shows. The depth of the beams is the height of a person - they can be inspected from the inside. I just can't see how that doesn't obstruct the view so much that you lose the effect.

It's a really remote area of the Canyon and most people have never visited it. I'm not crazy about the idea of cantilevering a structure over a National Park, but hopefully the exemption given to an Indian tribe won't be passed on to any old developer. I highly doubt that it would. If it really is spectacular, I think they might want to consider building one (only one) on the South Rim where most of the tourists visit.

I was at the Grand Canyon last year and it's so incredibly big, and it twists and turns so much that this isn't going to destroy anything.
 
Posts: 3041 | Location: USA | Registered: 06-04-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Platinum
Enthusiast
Picture of Kendor
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by methos:
There's something off there, and I think it's the meters measurement. The round number they've been giving is 4000 feet, which is 1219 meters.


Dare to compare?
 
Posts: 1803 | Location: 39° -84.5° | Registered: 06-28-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond
Enthusiast

Picture of Jenny Roberts
Posted Hide Post
I quite agree, it is hideous.

There is no better way to see the canyon in all it's glory than to go up in the helicopters. Nothing can prepare you for the moment you go over the edge. It is absolutely AWESOME!!!!!!!
 
Posts: 7910 | Location: Hyde.Cheshire. UK | Registered: 10-18-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Site
Administrator
Picture of DorianGreyed
Posted Hide Post
I agree that the best way to see the Grand Canyon is by helicopter. However, from what I can tell, the building seems to blend in with the canyon wall itself, minimizing aesthetic clash. Some factors for those who dislike the building to take in account:

The Grand Canyon is 277 miles long and anywhere from ¼ mile to 15 miles wide. Given the twists and turns of the canyon, it may be that the Skywalk isn't even visible from a mile or so away.

The development opens up a long-inaccessible 100-mile stretch of countryside along the canyon's South Rim. There is (was?) a 14 mile stretch of dirt road necessary to travel to get to the site; the site wasn't generating much income for the tribe.


I don't like 'despoiling nature' either, but it is done, regardless of my feelings. This at least benefits the original people of the Canyon (or the only ones left, anyway). My biggest concern is where the water will come from. The entire western US is using water faster than it is being replaced in underground aquifers. In fact, the largest one went past the point of no return about a decade or so ago. It will probably run out within the lifetime of some of those reading this thread. (But those fountains in Vegas sure do look good, don't they?)
 
Posts: 16731 | Location: Lincoln Place, Granite City, IL, USA | Registered: 06-03-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Platinum
Enthusiast
Posted Hide Post
Or the helicopter's virtual equivalent: Google Earth. Choose the "Colorado River View" near "Grand Canyon" in "Sightseeing."

By any chance, was that glass walkway made by the Acme company? Big Grin
 
Posts: 1911 | Location: U.S. | Registered: 06-03-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond
Enthusiast

Picture of aminator2002
Posted Hide Post
Hate to be a spoil sport about the Helicopter tours but I have to say what I have to say.

You are visiting a great natural monument. Touring via helicopter is the least environmentally friendly way to do it.

And while I was there I talked to some tour guides, one who had worked at the South Rim for 20 years, who told me that there are several outfitters that don't take proper care of their helicopters and that there are several crashes each year. If you'd like to read the statistics see this post at google http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=17078

In short form there are a lot more helicopter crashes with these touring outfitters than is expected in the rest of the country. About 1 fatality per 100,000 hours in the air.

I thought my hike was spectacular... I have also flown over the Canyon... hiking is the way to go.
 
Posts: 3041 | Location: USA | Registered: 06-04-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

    AnswerPool.com  Hop To Forum Categories  Travel  Hop To Forums  Destinations    Grand Canyon

© 2002-2008 AnswerPool.com



Visit DiscussionPool.com!