Click here for AnswerPool.com Home page


Google

    AnswerPool.com  Hop To Forum Categories  Science  Hop To Forums  Physics    4 Wheel Drive & Fuel Mileage

Moderators: clarebear
Go
Post
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Platinum
Enthusiast
Picture of Kendor
Posted
Remember the days when one would have to get out of his 4x4 and lock the front wheels before engaging the 4WD shifter in the cab? Well these days most 4WD vehicles' front hubs remain in the locked position so you can just engage the shifter, and in most cases just push a button to put it in 4WD.

So I was told recently that, because of this, these vehicles get poor fuel mileage in 2WD mode because the front wheels are constantly turning the mass of the front axles and gears within the transfer case, causing excess drag. Makes sense.

But my question is this:
If this is truth, then why don't I get better mileage when in 4WD mode? I mean, since the engine is now supplying power throughout the system, eliminating the excess drag, why is my fuel mileage even worse in 4WD? Is it because now, unknowingly, I am actually delivering more fuel to the system in order to overcome this drag? Someone please explain, in layman's terms.

Thanks.
 
Posts: 1863 | Location: 39° -84.5° | Registered: 06-28-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond
Enthusiast

Picture of frankvan
Posted Hide Post
I don't know why you would expect better mileage in 4 wheel drive because you haven't eliminated the load of the axles and gear which were present in the 2 wheel drive mode. In 2 wheel drive you supply power to 2 rear wheels plus two front idling mechanisms, in 4 wheel drive you supply power to 2 rear wheel + 2 front wheels + 2 front, now driving, wheels, axles, gears. No? Confused
 
Posts: 7155 | Location: Baltimore, MD, U.S.A | Registered: 06-03-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Platinum
Enthusiast
Picture of Kendor
Posted Hide Post
But in 4 wheel drive you have twice the number of traction points on the road to help overcome the vehicle's intertia, No?
 
Posts: 1863 | Location: 39° -84.5° | Registered: 06-28-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond
Enthusiast

Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Kendor:
But in 4 wheel drive you have twice the number of traction points on the road to help overcome the vehicle's intertia, No?


Hmm.On that basis, fitting wider tyres, thereby giving a larger 'footprint' on the road, would improve mileage, wouldn't it ? This is not something which European designers, whose fuel cost problems are vastly greater than yours, have done.They've done it to get better acceleration and grip on the performance versions but that's a question of using more fuel, more quickly, not less Smile

Hardly anyone here has a 4WD ; we don't see the point in offroad capability; save that Audi, eccentrically, have long made a 4WD 'Quattro' saloon because they tried to
persuade people it had better road- holding.Audi were really designing for their rally drivers, to win races where they drive sideways through forests, and used the sporty image to sell the cars to everyone else.

The problem is that the extra gearing and drive chain adds weight and takes a lot of extra energy anyway (extra friction, more work).The car doesn't go any faster (except in forests) and the fuel consumption is higher than that of a 2WD.
 
Posts: 8847 | Location: Newmarket, UK/ Antibes, S.France | Registered: 07-14-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

    AnswerPool.com  Hop To Forum Categories  Science  Hop To Forums  Physics    4 Wheel Drive & Fuel Mileage

© 2002-2008 AnswerPool.com



Visit DiscussionPool.com!