Gold Enthusiast

|
The Geneava Convention is the rules of war that countries are supposed to abide by. It outlines Human rights and it distinguishes the differences between a soldier and a criminal. Here's a link regarding POW treatment under these rules.
http://193.194.138.190/html/menu3/b/91.htm
|
| |
|
Diamond Enthusiast

|
|
| |
|
Diamond Enthusiast

|
And, in case you were wondering, Iraq agreed to the Convention in 1956, and the US ratified the Convention in 1955. Neither has agreed to the Additional Provisions, including Article 90.
And, lest I be accused of acting as though we're alone in this war, Australia, Poland, and the UK (the other 3 countries with armed troops involved) have all ratified the Geneva Convention and all of its provisions, including Article 90.
[This message was edited by methos5000 on 03-26-03 at 01:31 PM.]
|
| |
|
Gold Enthusiast

|
It's ironic that Iraq signed the convention in 1956. That was the year Hussein's made his failed attempt in a coup against the monarchy of King Faisal II.
|
| |
|
Diamond Enthusiast


|
Yow, that is a lot to read... I will go through it all one of these days, I promise! But to sum up (I need it in lay terms, pardon me, I just ain't that bright): Iraq agreed to the original Geneva Convention, right? They didn't think that Muslim law superceded it then, right? But that was under a different government in Iraq, right? Has Saddam Hussein's government ever said that it agreed with the Geneva Convention or ever ratified any part of it?
...Not that any of this has any bearing on whether or not he should follow the 'rules of war' (there's an oxymoron), I'm just trying to understand it.
|
| |
| Posts: 4425 | Location: Rochester, NY, USA | Registered: 06-03-02 |    |
|
Diamond Enthusiast

|
I don't know for sure that Iraq has formally agreed to the Geneva Convention since Saddam's coup in 1979, but it is still a member of the UN and has never formally withdrawn from the Geneva Convention.
|
| |
|