|
|
|
Go 
|
Post 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Diamond Enthusiast

|
A question after my own heart! I've asked Ritzmar similar ones about pianos, where all of the advantage seems to be in favor of the right-handed types (more dextrous by far than I, Fred  ). Stringing a piano backwards would be of course prohibitively expensive, but why not just string strings for right or left? I've heard there are left-handed guitar players who have guitars strung oppositely from right-handers. Seems to me it would be easy enough to string a violin in a similar way. Has this ever been tried? 
|
| |
| Posts: 2612 | Location: Upper U.S. | Registered: 06-11-02 |    |
|
Diamond Enthusiast


|
|
| |
| Posts: 6525 | Location: Grayson, Georgia, USA | Registered: 06-03-02 |    |
|
Diamond Enthusiast

|
Thanks for your efforts, everyone. For the right-hander the right arm and hand are the more natural to use to display emotion. The right-hander will thump a table, point, even embrace using that arm first. My guess is that the bowing arm is the right arm because it seems more natural for this. Through it is the spacing of the notes, rhythm, emphasis and volume conveyed. It is the right arm that is giving the artist's personal performance, his interpretation, it's life.The left hand just has the mechanical task of making sure that the pitch of each note is the one written by the composer. On a violin this is technically more difficult than the learner would like but once learned is insignificant in comparison. A guitarist no doubt has the same feeling. This would explain Sir Paul McCartney (correct spelling this time !) and apparently a great many southpaw guitarists, before and since, going to such trouble to play as they do, too.
|
| |
| Posts: 8678 | Location: Newmarket, UK/ Antibes, S.France | Registered: 07-14-02 |    |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© 2002-2008 AnswerPool.com
Visit DiscussionPool.com! |