Diamond Enthusiast


|
|
| |
| Posts: 7954 | Location: Hyde.Cheshire. UK | Registered: 10-18-02 |    |
|

|
Interesting question, Ritzmar. According to this website collective nouns "originated in an English hunting tradition (of uncertain origin) for giving poetic names to prey. (The phrase 'terms of venery' is an archaic synonym for collective nouns - 'venery' in this context meaning the "act of hunting"). For this reason, most collective nouns refer to animals. This tradition dates back to at least the 15th century. Many of these original collective nouns are archaic: a 'harass of horses' doesn't seem to have been used much since the 1400s".This webiste tells us that "many come from a book called The Book of St Albans which in appeared in the very early days of printing in England (around 1486) and the bit containing these collective nouns is attributed to one Dame Julia (or Juliana) Barnes".The Book of St Albans was written in three parts, on hawking, hunting and heraldry, so that ties in with the "hunting" orirgin. You can read more about it here. It is said that when attending a reception in honour of several former British Prime Ministers, Harold Macmillan was asked what the appropriate collective noun for them would be. His reply was "A lack of principals!". 
|
| |
|
Diamond Enthusiast


|
|
| |
| Posts: 7954 | Location: Hyde.Cheshire. UK | Registered: 10-18-02 |    |
|