The usage you speak of is common in my experience here in the colonies, too, Fred.
You might find the following of some interest also (then, again, maybe not

). I grew up in a "racially-mixed" neighborhood. When narrating a sequence of pure actions, the white children of my acquaintance all used the verb "go/went," as in "Well, first she went 'smack', so then I went 'pow', and then..." (we we're a rather violent lot, I'm afraid, and we often used only a gesture in place of the words in single quotes in contexts like the above.) The Black children in our neighborhood uniformly preferred the verb "say/said" in these same kinds of situations: "So this fool said 'wham', so then I said 'pow' upside his head, and then..."
It's interesting (to me, at least) that this verbal behavior is precisely the opposite (or maybe 'complementary' is a better word for it) to the one you mention, in that "say" is substituted for "go," whereas in your examples "go" is substituted for "say."
There must be something about "go" and "say" that invites this kind of substitution of one for the other, in
both directions. Don't ask me what it is, though.