|
|
|
Go 
|
Post 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Diamond Enthusiast

|
I'm not sure when it began, but it should be noted that the singular form is not typically used to refer to a woman. Many women would be insulted to be refered to as a guy. The plural form, however, is fairly common in referring to groups that include women, and occasionally for groups of just women.
|
| |
|
Diamond Enthusiast

|
Hasn't it always been applied to both sexes? It's just one of the many ways to get around the glitch in English that has 'you' for second person singular and plural.
You guys (US and Canada), you lot (England), you all (American South), youse (Scotland, New York), you folks, you people, you-uns...
|
| |
|
Platinum Enthusiast
|
quote: Originally posted by babthrower: "You guys" or "those guys" referring to a group mixed as to sex has been in use as long as I can remember, informally.
But it would seem odd to say 'that guy' if the person indicated is a woman.
I guess it's generic, like "man" including women if the reference is to the group, but not used if the group consists only of women.
Yes, "guys" has become a sort of shorthand for "guys and gals" So if you wereferring to only one, and the one in question were female, that guy would certainly be inappropriate. In fact, if a group of women is intended, some variant on girls is normally used -- at least here where I am. Alan Moore
|
| |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© 2002-2008 AnswerPool.com
Visit DiscussionPool.com! |