Click here for AnswerPool.com Home page


Google

    AnswerPool.com  Hop To Forum Categories  Life & Living  Hop To Forums  Genealogy    Not a trick question

Moderators: MrsS
Go
Post
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Diamond
Enthusiast

Posted
Okay, this is neither a trick question nor a riddle, though it is pretty confusing. I am trying to figure out how my "Aunt" is actually related to me.

My great-great-grandmother, Camille, was married three times. She did not have any children with the first marriage. The second, she was married to a man named "Baldwin" with whom she had my great-grandmother Mae, and Mae's two brothers. The third marriage, to a man named Fitzgerald, she had two children: Loretta and John.

Mae (from marriage #2) had a daughter named Ruth, who had my father, who had me.

John had a daughter named Pat.

Pat is my "Aunt", whom I love dearly, but I'm trying to figure out how we are actually related. Like, second cousin, something like that.

Thanks.
 
Posts: 3065 | Location: A place with palm trees and sunshine! | Registered: 03-17-03Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond Enthusiast

Posted Hide Post
I hope I am reading your description correctly, and also hope others will offer their confirmations or alternative suggestions.

My explanation uses this kinship chart.

As I understand things:

Pat is the grandchild of your great great grandmother, but not in your direct lineage. This would normally make Pat your 1st cousin twice removed and Pat's father, John, your great grand uncle.

Because John was Mae's half brother, then put "half" in front of these descriptions. Thus Pat is your half 1st cousin twice removed. Your genetic kinship is 1.5625%.

But you are obviously much closer Smile
 
Posts: 8105 | Location: in the backwoods of North Carolina | Registered: 06-07-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond
Enthusiast

Posted Hide Post
Thank you very much Fuse! Half first cousin twice removed sounds a lot better than "I don't know, but we're related somehow!" lol

We don't share any obvious genetic kinship--you'd never guess we were related lol

So Pat's son would be my half 2nd cousin twice removed? So that would be legally not related, which is EXCELLENT because I can't stand the little jerk Razz Whoo hoo! I get to keep the one I love and disown the one I can't stand! Big Grin
 
Posts: 3065 | Location: A place with palm trees and sunshine! | Registered: 03-17-03Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond Enthusiast

Posted Hide Post
Half second cousin once removed (removed has to do with how many generations apart the two of you are even if you are close in age). Certainly far enough distant to disown Big Grin
 
Posts: 8105 | Location: in the backwoods of North Carolina | Registered: 06-07-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond
Enthusiast

Posted Hide Post
Yay!! Big Grin Big Grin Now I don't have to pretend to care when he gets in trouble any more! Big Grin
 
Posts: 3065 | Location: A place with palm trees and sunshine! | Registered: 03-17-03Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond Enthusiast

Posted Hide Post
I don't even think you have to go to his funeral.
 
Posts: 8105 | Location: in the backwoods of North Carolina | Registered: 06-07-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond
Enthusiast

Posted Hide Post
Well, I wouldn't take it that far!

Hey, additional question: is the child of my mother's sister's daughter my second cousin, or my first cousin once removed? First cousin once removed, right?
 
Posts: 3065 | Location: A place with palm trees and sunshine! | Registered: 03-17-03Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Gold Enthusiast
Picture of Ewood27
Posted Hide Post
Yup, 1st cousin once removed. Mother's sister's daughter is your first cousin, so her child is your first cousin once removed (and second cousin to your children).
 
Posts: 744 | Location: Surrey, England | Registered: 06-03-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond
Enthusiast

Posted Hide Post
Thanks! I'm about to have a little first cousin once removed, and I wanted to be sure what to call the relationship Wink
 
Posts: 3065 | Location: A place with palm trees and sunshine! | Registered: 03-17-03Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond Enthusiast

Posted Hide Post
This could sound really dumb of me, but I have no idea what 'once or twice removed' mean? Confused What does it mean?
 
Posts: 6723 | Location: Land of Lincoln, USA | Registered: 07-04-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Bronze
Enthusiast
Picture of Dixie
Posted Hide Post
The child of your first cousin is not your second cousin but your first cousin once removed. The child of your first cousin once removed is your first cousin twice removed. Look here.
 
Posts: 314 | Location: Mobile, Alabama | Registered: 06-03-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond Enthusiast

Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by honilov:
This could sound really dumb of me, but I have no idea what 'once or twice removed' mean? Confused What does it mean?

To be a full cousin you must be of the same generation and share the same relationship with common ancestors. Cousins share grandparents and 2nd cousins share great grandparents.

Cousins who are "removed" are not of the same generation. As Dixie said, the child of your first cousin (who is one generation removed from you) is your first cousin once removed.
 
Posts: 8105 | Location: in the backwoods of North Carolina | Registered: 06-07-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond Enthusiast

Posted Hide Post
Thanks Dixie and Fuse. I never knew how that work. I've always been lost on the cousins. I've heard people say, 'I'm some kin to so and so, I'm their cousin' and I'm wondering when do the blood line run out. I'm thinking to myself, at that rate, we are kin to Adam and Eve. Eek
 
Posts: 6723 | Location: Land of Lincoln, USA | Registered: 07-04-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond
Enthusiast

Posted Hide Post
In a way, we all are. Here is a long dry explanation, but basically we are all related, and evolutionists refer to the first female of our species as Eve.
 
Posts: 3065 | Location: A place with palm trees and sunshine! | Registered: 03-17-03Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

    AnswerPool.com  Hop To Forum Categories  Life & Living  Hop To Forums  Genealogy    Not a trick question

© 2002-2008 AnswerPool.com



Visit DiscussionPool.com!