Well gee, re-reading my post I see I was a bit rude. I guess I shouldn't have added the cancers to that list. Sorry if I offended in any manner here.

Personally I mayn't appreciate somebody putting it that way to me.
So please let me clarify what I meant.
Skin cancers are a growing concern in our society, more and more people are getting skin cancers, moles and premature aging simply because we no longer bundle up, wearing excessive clothing out of some myth-guided sense of purity.
I am all for that healthy look in a person, however the downside is a higher risk of skin cancers and wrinkles.
I have had a few suspicious moles removed and each time a new one appears I worry about my wreckless shirtless youth when I was a pretty boy showing off a healthy body. Today I know the risks, I understand that the price of a "healthy" tan is aging and a higher probability of skin blemishes and cancers. I think that a bit more awareness of the health risks needs to be applied against the Magazine models who show off that bronzed look with a 6 pack or "perfect 10" body.
I really would hate to learn that Clarebear got a cancerous mole because we thought that a tanning salon was safer than suntan due to some erroneous data that only the UVB is harmful and the type of UV (UVA) you get at a salon is not.
David