|
|
|
Go 
|
Post 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Platinum Enthusiast
|
Wikipedia has an article on Insect Evolution that say: quote: During this era, some giant dragonfly-like forms – e.g. Meganeura and Meganeuropsis (Order Protodonata) and Mazothairos (Order Palaeodictyoptera) – reached wingspans of 55 to 70 cm (22 to 28 in), making them far larger than any living insect. Also their nymphs must have had a very impressive size.
This gigantism may have been due to higher atmospheric oxygen levels (up to 80% above modern levels during the Carboniferous) that allowed increased respiratory efficiency relative to today. The lack of flying vertebrates could have been another factor.
The largest living insects today are found in the tropics, suggesting that warmer temperatures favor size. Insects breathe by gas diffusion through a passive system of tubules. Diffusion rate rises with temperature, so warmer insects can deliver oxygen to more cells fed by each tubule, i.e., larger bodies. The "80% above modern levels" in the quote above refers to atmospheric oxygen levels in the Mesozoic of 35-40% compared to 21% today, allowing even more efficient oxygen delivery to the body. So it was a combination of higher global temperatures with significantly higher oxygen levels that allowed those giant prehistoric insects to exist. But it sounds (from Wikipedia at least) like the famous giant dragonflies were standouts even then among the insects.
|
| |
|
Diamond Enthusiast

|
Yeah Read that, and from the other sites it is copied on to as well. I think you may have misread what I wrote. I am looking to learn about more than just the dragonfly, I want to know what other large insects once existed. Thus my question above starts: quote: Other than the giant Dragonfly (which appears popular over the web) what other giant insects existed?
|
| |
| Posts: 4146 | Location: Neither here nor there | Registered: 06-03-02 |    |
|
Platinum Enthusiast
|
I didn't misunderstand -- just giving general principles -- you're right about the difficulty of finding details. From childhood I remember giant dragonflies in the Carboniferous diorama at the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago, but I don't recall other insects, either. Btw, to correct myself, oxygen levels may have reached 35% but not 40%. From a blog article at The Littoral Zone: giant insects of the carboniferous quote: Many different species of gigantic dragonfly existed during this period, as well as gargantuan versions of our modern mayfly and, of course, cockroach. Scientists believe that high oxygen levels compensated for the inefficiency of the insects’ respiratory systems, which, unlike humans’, are not centralized and rely on the passive diffusion of air through their tissues. In the lower-oxygen-content atmosphere of today, insects’ respiration is too inefficient to allow their bodies to grow much thicker than (in the dragonfly’s case) a pencil, and indeed, giant insects began to disappear as the Permian period dawned and oxygen levels began to decline.
From Encyclopedia of Entomology: quote: At the close of the Paleozoic, the Permian period, the environment of earth was undergoing significant change, most notably a less tropical climate. Numerous insects from many deposits around the world document over a dozen orders of insects, including the occurrence of "giant" insects.
This 1916 survey of "Mesozoic and Tertiary insects of Queensland and New South Wales" notes "a fairly large moth"; "a large insect probably related to ...Protohemiptera" [ancestor of 'true bugs']; and a "rather large" member of Blattoidea [cockroaches]. Being an amateur insect collector (there's dg rolling her eyes again  ) helps navigate some taxonomic terms. "According to this article, "Mayflies grew to canary size." Hope that helps. If you find a definitive source please post it -- I think it's a great question.
|
| |
|
Diamond Enthusiast

|
Dragonfly Moth Cockroach And Mayflies the size of jets - I mean canaries  Hm. Not a large list.
|
| |
| Posts: 4146 | Location: Neither here nor there | Registered: 06-03-02 |    |
|
Platinum Enthusiast
|
"Not a large list." I don't know. In modern times gigantic tropical insects span a diverse range of orders -- butterflies, beetles*, true bugs, grasshoppers, lantern flies, etc. -- demonstrating success in multiple niches. So it's plausible that along with giant dragonflies, most insects in general several hundred million years ago might have been larger or even gigantic -- constrained only by their respiratory systems and with relatively fewer predators than today. The articles point out that there are huge gaps in the insect fossil record. Maybe absence of evidence is not evidence of absence? ------------------- * I've got a tropical rhinoceros beetle hanging in a framed case on my wall -- it's the size of a mouse (purchased locally -- no big-bug safaris for me  )
|
| |
|
Platinum Enthusiast
|
Yes, that refers to house-sized bugs -- you know, the ones that grew unnaturally large in the 1950s because of radiation in the aftermath of A-bomb tests, when mankind was tampering with forces it didn't understand and unwittingly unleashing nature's fury, and let that be a cautionary lesson for the rest of us... An ant the size of cow could not support its own weight on those spindly legs. If you scale a bug up proportionally, its weight grows as the cube of its size while the strength of its parts grows only as the square (cross-sectional area). Strength to weight ratio always shrinks. That's why elephants have short, stubby legs. King Kong's leg bones would have snapped under his great weight. In the case of actual giant insects, they still don't / didn't weigh THAT much. Giant dragonflies had slender bodies and large, membranous wings and strong flight muscles -- a very efficient 'design' (produced by natural selection).
|
| |
|
Platinum Enthusiast
|
"So there is lack of fossils?" Fossils are rare and invertebrate fossils are rarer. Gaps in the record are inevitable & falsely exploited by creationists as a weakness in evidence for Darwinism -- the God of the Gaps argument. Anyhow, this article includes a nice timeline -- if you can stand the British spelling of Cenozoic  : Kendall Bioresearch. quote: The same coal deposits also contain the fossils of diverse archaic insects belonging to ancient lines that, unlike the cockroaches, gradually disappeared before the end of the Paleozoic era, leaving no modern descendants. Many of these archaic forms are huge dragonfly-like insects, with a wing-span of 20 cm or more, like the Palaeodictyoptera and Protodonata illustrated below - true 'dinosaurs' of the insect world.
It sounds like those critters, among paleolozoic insects over 300 million years ago, were in a size class by themselves.
|
| |
|
Platinum Enthusiast
|
Edit: paleolozoic paleozoic.
|
| |
|
Diamond Enthusiast

|
quote: Originally posted by Professor: if you can stand the British spelling of Cenozoic
Yet they spell Palaeozoic, 'Paleozoic'  And, strictly, their Caenozoic should be Cainozoic [Greek: kainos 'new,recent' ] which is how it is, alternatively, written here.
|
| |
| Posts: 11171 | Location: Newmarket, UK/ Antibes, S.France | Registered: 07-14-02 |    |
|
Platinum Enthusiast
|
quote: Originally posted by FredPuli: Yet they spell Palaeozoic, 'Paleozoic'  And, strictly, their Caenozoic should be Cainozoic [Greek: kainos 'new,recent' ] which is how it is, alternatively, written here.
No offense meant -- just an aversion I have to ae ligatures. More jarring than usual because I hadn't seen geologic eras so labeled (I mean, labelled  ). The same Greek root appears as an ending -cene for periods after the Mesozoic, such as the Eocene ('dawn of recent time') etc. Never learned them all. Speaking of giant insects, have you met my brother-in-law?
|
| |
|
Platinum Enthusiast
|
Budda-boom. Shoulda quit while I was ahead...
Sir, You're not funny. Ask around! --Good Morning, Vietnam
|
| |
|
Platinum Enthusiast
|
Thanks for brightening my day with a captive pinniped performing insipid tricks for human entertainment. The walrus has great articulation and intonation, but how on earth did it get a soprano sax to sound like an alto -- must be its embouchure. Of course in Alabama the Tuscaloosa. 
|
| |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© 2002-2009 AnswerPool.com
All Rights Reserved
Using This Site Means You Accept Its Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Close Cover Before Striking
3D Glasses Required for Optimal Viewing
Now in HD and Surround Sound
Offer Void Where Prohibited by Law
There's a Bathroom on the Right
Caution - Objects May Be Closer Than They Appear
Anything You Post May Be Used Against You in the Court of Public Opinion
Visit DiscussionPool.com! |