|
|
|
Go 
|
Post 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Diamond Enthusiast


|
|
| |
| Posts: 6887 | Location: Baltimore, MD, U.S.A | Registered: 06-03-02 |    |
|
Diamond Enthusiast


|
No, twins that are fraternal can NOT share the same placenta.
|
| |
|
Diamond Enthusiast


|
quote: Originally posted by Georgia85: And yes, identical twins are always the same sex
and this is because the twins were once a single egg.. it was split in half and so they HAVE to be the same sex.
|
| |
|
Diamond Enthusiast


|
Think of it this way. "fraternal" means brotherly. So if two babies are born in only one pregnancy, and they are 'fraternal' twins, it is just as if they were ordinary brothers (or sisters) except that they were born at one time.
So there are two placentas, each containing one fraternal twin.
But if they are identical twins, they were once just one egg! Really. Then as the cell started dividing, at some point each 'half' just takes off and they become different individuals, but because they came from the same egg, they have the same DNA.
So that is why identical twins are always the same sex.
Whereas fraternal (or 'just brothers' or sisters) twins can be either sex. They can both be boys. They can both be girls. There can be one boy and one girl.
So I would go with what your own doctor told you.
Fingerprints get affected by what happens to hands. Even while in the womb. And later in life, fingerprints are often useless in detecting identical twins, because so much happens to our hands just in living every day!
So you should get the test.
Or you could just say, hey, they're cute and healthy, so they're fine as they are!
|
| |
| Posts: 6257 | Location: British Columbia, Canada | Registered: 06-11-02 |    |
|
Diamond Enthusiast

Site Administrator

|
Glad our members were able to help you sort this out mimmysayhow! Although I don't know the answer to the "2 sacs" issue, this is something I'm sure you'll be able to find out with a little more research of if one of our medical professionals can explain it in more detail. The little differences you saw early on could easily have been attributed to the birth itself, how they were lying in the womb, etc. Even if they're identical in genetics, there could still be some minor differences - identical doesn't always mean exact, if that makes sense. There are many outside influences that can determine appearance as Babs indicated in her post above. One comment on the aside...please do not type in all upper-case when you post. It makes it harder to read, and all caps is often seen as "shouting".  Good luck with your twins, and have fun...they won't be as much fun in 13-14 years! 
|
| |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© 2002-2008 AnswerPool.com
Visit DiscussionPool.com! |