|
|
|
Go 
|
Post 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Diamond Enthusiast

|
Follow the money... 'The candidates’ third quarter reports, released in mid-October, showed that Hillary had raised $90.9 million. That exceeds her $75 million goal for 2007, the Center for Responsive Politics points out, noting that Hillary is asking her big donors, the “Hillraisers,” to come up with $1 million a piece—ten times what George W. Bush asked his elite donors, the Pioneers, to pony up. Barack Obama is running second to Hillary, at $80.2 million, while Mitt Romney has raised $62.8 million and Rudy Giuliani is at $47.3 million.' www.progressive.org
|
| |
|
Diamond Enthusiast

|
How does the system work? American commentators have been saying that Rudy Giuliani is pleased if Huckabee successfully attacks other candidates, because Huckabee hasn't got the funding to fight a national campaign, so is not a threat to Rudy, and that all makes Rudy's job easier. How come? If Huckabee starts to rocket up the polls will he then find that the funding comes in or is he ever destined to lose for lack of funds? It seems odd if any candidate could be the best and most popular but not be chosen simply because he hadn't got enough money behind him ! Or is that the American way?  (Confusing because, as you know, Britain runs everything, including politics, on the cheap!)
|
| |
| Posts: 8071 | Location: Newmarket, UK/ Antibes, S.France | Registered: 07-14-02 |    |
|
Diamond Enthusiast

|
'As the electoral success of disparate figures from Ronald Reagan to Bill Clinton bears out, likeability is vital in American politics.' Why Hillary won't win
|
| |
|
Diamond Enthusiast

|
quote: Originally posted by coldfuse: Wouldn't a Huckabee - Obama race be refreshing? I enjoy hearing both of them speak, for different reasons.
Seconded!
|
| |
| Posts: 8071 | Location: Newmarket, UK/ Antibes, S.France | Registered: 07-14-02 |    |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© 2002-2008 AnswerPool.com
Visit DiscussionPool.com! |