|
|
|
Go 
|
Post 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Diamond Enthusiast


|
Now,deadbeat parents are criminels,you can even loose your DL here for that,among other things. But I would arrange a list with serious offenders first,(most wanted) let's say people who owe $20,000 and more,then a list with people who owe between $10,000 - $20,000.The list could start at $5,000.That,is of course an exemple.
Children are living in really bad conditions ( when they shouldn,t be) because of these individuals who won't care at all for their own children.I say make these parents pay by pointing a finger at them and help the sheriff,by reporting these sad individuals and collect the monies due.I have to take the children side.Show the future generations the weight of the responsability on putting a child on this planet.It can't be bad?
|
| |
| Posts: 6049 | Location: u.s.a, south Florida | Registered: 06-03-02 |    |
|
Diamond Enthusiast


|
Dvd, I'm reluctant to take issue with you because I almost always agree with your posts. So I will just point out a few things.
Neighborly ways: In the small country town where I grew up, everyone knew everything (almost) about everybody. They used the information to guide their interactions.
- If someone stiffed a neighbor over the price of a load of hay, soon that 'someone' had a hard time buying hay on credit. - If someone drove drunk and had an accident, he/she got the 'treatment' (sent to Coventry) and either reformed his/her ways or might as well leave town. - If someone had in his/her family a genetic defect, that was a factor to consider in contemplation of marriage.
Example: There was an incestuous family in our community. Everyone knew it. (How? Those kids talked at school about things that no normally-raised children knew about in those days. And you dare not be alone with them at school or they would initiate sex 'play'.) They were ostracised. There was no point in reporting them to children's services -- such reports were ignored because 'a man's home is his castle' was the approach in those days. The system protected the individual with knowledge.
The system sometimes failed, as all systems sometimes do, because 'information' might get confused with common gossip. This was usually sorted out in time.
In these days especially in urban settings everyone is completely anonymous. So it is possible for an anti-social person to victimize someone and then just move on.
It is this latter situation which is new in terms of the human condition.
So if we use new technology to overcome the anonymity which allows innocent people to be victimized, I think that is a 'good thing.' If it means that you can find out that I jaywalked in Vancouver in March 2004, fine by me. Or that I was convicted of something. After all, that is why trials are open to the public: justice must be seen to be done.
|
| |
| Posts: 6253 | Location: British Columbia, Canada | Registered: 06-11-02 |    |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© 2002-2008 AnswerPool.com
Visit DiscussionPool.com! |