It's tough (verging on impossible) for an outsider to make healthy suggestions based on a few words only from only one of the parties.
Here are a few points to consider.
1. When an intelligent young person ( and your son surely is that) can go to one parent with non-specific complaints ("He's always negative...") this can generate a kind of false basis for an alliance. (Clearly your son is trying to make you his ally against the disciplinarian. You are his only chance to prevail -- the only one able to stand up to dad.)
2. You as a nurturing mom naturally want fair play for son, and want him to see family discipline as rational and justifiable.
HOWEVER...
Parents must support each other consistently. If you want to know what happens when they don't , watch Supernanny.
In another four or five years, when your sons want only to be with their peers, and think all discipline is irrational and arbitrary, household chores are the parents 'job', school work is irrelevant to their interests, ane the family car is theirs on demand, your home life could be totally chaotic.
A clever child is totally happy when every attempt at discipline "Do your homework; stop hitting your brother; No you can't have french fries and ice cream for supper; eat your vegetables" can be countered by some argument: "You're always picking on me; You never care what I think; He started it; Mom said I could,"
in which one or both parents can be confused and diverted. Result: the original issue is forgotten, the parents focus their attention on each other instead of on the behavior, and the kid is off the hook.
Time to assess the situation very, very carefully.
First assess yourself. Do you follow through with the children when problems occur? For example, if screams and cries of dismay are heard from another room where the boys are watching television, do you go to see, observing before listening to anyone's 'story'? Or do you just call "Now stop that or no TV!", and the noise lessens, and you're satisfied that the problem is resolved?
Good parenting is hard work. Eternal vigilence, Julia, you bet. Consistent follow-through.
1. Check the details.
"He changed the channel I was watching."
"He wasn't watching. He was playing with ..." whatever.
There should be a rule about who decides what to watch. (You don't want a television in every single room. This is too indulgent, plus the kids miss the chance to learn to share resources.)
2. Resolve the problem decisively.
"John gets to watch until the show he was watching is over. Then you pick the next show, Paul. You know that's the rule."
"But it's not fair, he..."
"No further discussion. The subject's closed, Paul, or there will be consequences. Use the time while you're waiting to put your bike away."
"I'll do that after."
"No. Now. After, you'll be watching TV, remember?"
"It's not fair, you always take his side!"
At this point there needs to be a consequence. He's been warned. He's just dragging it out, because he's still ticked off that he wasn't allowed to 'bump' his brother off the TV.
"You have just lost your television privileges for today."
"AWWWWWW! You..."
"Want to try for lost privileges tomorrow too? One more word."
And stick to it. Once a penalty has been assigned, DO NOT be talked out of it. If you do, you will ALWAYS be confronted by a legalistic argument on EVERY SINGLE decision you make. It's the gambler's "random reward" motivator at work. If that kid can guilt or argue you out of a penalty just once, he will never quit trying to see if it will work next time, and you will be tied up in endless justification, rationalization, and talk, talk, talk, with your kids.
You really need to sit down with dad and talk about this. Remember that each of you can easily second-guess the other's decision at any time. Either of you could say:
"You're too hard on the boy. So what if he (does X) once in a while. He's young!"
"Your tone of voice sounded angry."
"I know you said he had to practice his double bass for an hour. But I said it would be okay if he skipped just this once, he said he'd do double practice tomorrow." (P.S. this is a no-no. Never contravene the other parent's decision without at least checking with the other parent and letting him know why there is an issue and getting his consent.)
These conversations are okay
away from the kids.And don't - don't - (I'm sure you don't!) try to be good guy with your kid, so he'll think you're more understanding than Dad. If you tend to do that, your family needs counselling.
Bottom line: Don't be sidetracked by generalized statements from your sons: "He always... He never..." Insist on specifics.
Intervene only in urgent cases. "Dad said he's confiscating my iPod because I skipped sports practice today. He wouldn't listen when I said you took me to the dentist's."
I don't mean to be hard on your kids. It's just that I know how smart they are. And we all like to get our own way.
