|
|
|
Go 
|
Post 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
|
|
donrent - I used to have a friend growing up whose father routinely changed religions depending upon what he wanted to do that his current religion didn't allow. They were only allowed to watch Christian movies, listen to Christian music, the girls weren't allowed to cut their hair or even wear lip gloss...but the father had two illigitamate children with girlfriends and ended up losing their trailer home because of gambling debt. There are a lot of things in my history that I'd love to erase, but I can't. I wish I could, but I can't. Must be nice to be able to just erase unpleasantness from your life, huh? 
|
| |
| Posts: 784 | Location: Fairbanks, AK, USA | Registered: 08-17-02 |    |
|
Diamond Enthusiast


|
Born again virgin.... absolutely ridiculous.
What I find even more unbelievable is that people can listen to people talk about this kind of thing without laughing themselves silly.
I have an ex-friend who thinks that you can erase things that happen in life. It just doesn't work that way. You gotta deal with it.
|
| |
|
Site Administrator

|
"...but why can't a women or a man choose who they lose their virginity to." Generally speaking, they do. "You are only what you believe you are." I believe I'm wealthy, tall, thin, and have a full head of hair. Oops! I just checked my bank balance and a mirror. So much for that theory.  "I'm not talking about people that have had loads of sexual partners (they have their own issues to deal with). Just the people that have made 1 (or 2) mistakes and now will save themselves for the right man (or woman). this is nothing that should be sneered at - we all learn from our mistakes, and the people who have made this mistake then realise that casual (no loving) sex is not for them and they now know they want to be in a loving, committed relationship before they have sex again." So only people who have had one or two sexual experiences qualify? Over that, and you don't get to "discover yourself all over again"? Who drew the line? "There is a really fine line between being/ and not being a virgin." Not really. It's generally fairly easy to see the "line". Prior to having sex for the first time, you are a virgin. After you've had sex once, you aren't. Most people notice when that transformation takes place. Even I can remember that far back. (SHUP, SR.) ******************************************** "...a fully grown sex toy..." They grow ?!?!? 
|
| |
| Posts: 16544 | Location: Lincoln Place, Granite City, IL, USA | Registered: 06-03-02 |    |
|
Diamond Enthusiast


|
"Use are all mindless."
Is that a Chicago accent I detect?
The real issue is not whether people adopting an ethic of chastity can call themselves "Reborn virgins." It's whether or not they understand that it's utter sillyness to label themselves. Is it so hard to keep your morals about sex unlabeled and to yourself? Why go about trying to redefine words such that they fit your new found belief system?
Does the act of labeling oneself a reborn virgin actually assist the person of living up to the ethic behind it? Is it just an easy way for them to explain to new partners that they aren't interested in a sexual relationship? Does anyone really care if a 30 year old woman finally realizes that sex is important to her in a more than physical manner?
Having self esteem is typically enough to make a woman know that, with or without a label of "virgin", she is important and deserves a good and meaningful relationship or marriage.
It just seems like such "support group" type language. Women and men that use it sound hokey to many people - and those people may not be the mindless ones. How many "born again" types have lived a life of moderation before needing to be born again? That's the reason why many people think "born agains" are perhaps the biggest hypocrites of the world.
|
| |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© 2002-2008 AnswerPool.com
Visit DiscussionPool.com! |