It took a lawsuit, but at least some of the facts will come out. Can anyone think of a legitimate reason why logs of an convicted felon's White House visits shouldn't be public knowledge? Who owns the White House? Of course, bush is on record as saying ""I've never sat down with him and had a discussion with the guy." However,
Convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff says President Bush knew him well enough to joke with him about weightlifting. "What are you benching, buff guy?" Abramoff said Mr. Bush asked him.
Abramoff said he finds it hard to believe Mr. Bush doesn't remember the 10 or so photos he and members of his family had snapped with the president and first lady.
"He (Bush) has one of the best memories of any politician I have ever met," Abramoff wrote in an e-mail, according to Vanity Fair's April issue being released this week. "Perhaps he has forgotten everything. Who knows?" (CBSNews.com)
Remember, Abramoff raised over $100,000 for bush's campaign, enough for him to be a member of the elite "Pioneer Club" of fund-raisers.
I wonder if the logs will have been sanitized by now.
Posts: 17034 | Location: Lincoln Place, Granite City, IL, USA | Registered: 06-03-02
Yeah, they've had plenty of time to alter the documents. The photo already proved Bush was lying about not meeting him, so you know they will remove as much evidence as possible from the documents.
If Bush can change any rule or law, it won't be any problem to change a document underhandedly.
Posts: 6638 | Location: Land of Lincoln, USA | Registered: 07-04-02