That's quite unusual. Rudy is painted as a 911 hero by media. He was New York mayor. How could a New York hero be booed by New Yorkers? Rudy is also said by media as leading in GOP's candidates in President campaign. Does it mean Bush's party is really unpopular, or media used to cheat public by false propaganda, or both? Or people won't believe the fairy tale of media anymore?
Quote, "Yankee Fans Hate Rudy
By: Jane Hamsher The most frequent use of mixing politics and baseball at Yankee stadium is Steinbrenner’s promotion of right wing extremist Rudy Giuliani. Giuliani gets a front row, unimpeded view of Yankee games because these seats are given to him by Steinbrenner. Then Yankee stadium officials and the networks try to plaster Rudy Giuliani’s face all over the big screen and the television. This amounts to millions of dollars of free advertising, something quite beneficial when you are running for President.
But Steinbrenner overplayed his hand. Giuliani got roundly booed at Yankee Stadium and this will play out on the campaign trail.
That's funny, but wouldn't any of the presidential candidates have been boo-ed if they'd had their faces put up on the big screen? It's not necessarily hate, just sports-crowd humour.
I think it just goes to show how sick and tired the people are of Republicans! 9-11 poster boy or no, makes little difference at this point. The American people's attention span doesn't hold for that long. When they see Giuliani's face plastered up on the big screen, all they see is another potential 4 years of War in Iraq, et all. And, that definitely calls for a wave of boos.
That's funny, but wouldn't any of the presidential candidates have been boo-ed if they'd had their faces put up on the big screen? It's not necessarily hate, just sports-crowd humour.
I agree that it is not hate; especially in New York or Philadelphia .
I was at Shea Stadium for a game this year (Queens, New York) and they announced that Senator Clinton was in attendance and put her mug up on the big screen. She was booed quite loudly; so much that the man sitting next to her (President Clinton) was laughing because he saw the sports crowd humor in it.
Heck in Philadelphia they boisterously booed Santa Claus at Christmas time a couple of years ago.
Posts: 3654 | Location: Long Island, New York USA | Registered: 06-03-02
That must be universal.Somebody doesn't know much about sports fans It wouldn't matter whose picture was shown at soccer grounds here, short of a recently deceased player's during the one minute tribute applause, the crowd would jeer its collective head off It's astonishing that any politician would permit it or any stadium show such an image , unless they were doing it for a laugh !
Giuliani got booed because of his constant use of 9/11 in his campaign 9/11. Giuliani (9/11), always wants to (9/11) make sure everyone (9/11) remembers him as the mayor of New york in 9/11.
9/11,9/11,9/11......Vote For Giuliani...9/11!!!!!
Posts: 2693 | Location: USA | Registered: 06-07-02
The bird of a feather flock together. So are the candidates of President. Only those follow the order of the Inside group have the chance to be selected.
Hillary and Rudy are the same: they support war. They cover up 911 false flag attack. They support un-Constitutional rule. That's why in media's poll, they are always rewarded with a leading post.
Why Clinton II wouldn't offer much change from Bush II
Radley Balko | October 19, 2007
For seven years, the left has been up in arms about President Bush's aggressive foreign policy, his secrecy, his partisanship, and his expansive claims on executive power. It's odd, then, that they're prepared to nominate Hillary Clinton to carry the party into the 2008 elections.
Hillary Clinton voted for both the Patriot Act and its reauthorization. She voted for building a wall on the U.S.-Mexican border. She voted to loosen restrictions limiting the federal government's ability to wiretap cell phones. In the past, she has supported a robust role for the federal government in enforcing "decency" standards in television and music. She teamed up with former Sen. Rick Santorum on a bill calling for the federal government to restrict the sale of violent video games.
Posts: 211 | Location: San Jose | Registered: 12-11-05
Rody was lucky only to get a boo. Rumsfeld had to flee from an arrest. France, after all, is still a leading liberty.
Quote, "Rumsfeld flees France fearing arrest Sat, 10/27/2007 - 08:45
Former US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld fled France today fearing arrest over charges of "ordering and authorizing" torture of detainees at both the American-run Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq and the US military's detainment facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, unconfirmed reports coming from Paris suggest. - http://wor.ldne.ws/node/8596
Edited to remove overlong quote of copyrighted material.
This message has been edited. Last edited by: DorianGreyed,
Posts: 211 | Location: San Jose | Registered: 12-11-05
"War on terror" created to squeeze money and power from people. "Terrorist" also used to demonize dissenters. How much evil committed by this government in the name of "war on terror"?
Quote, "Media Infers Ron Paul Is A Terrorist
November 5th "Money Bomb" gimmick heavily played up by terrified establishment and goblin neocon bloggers
Steve Watson Infowars.net Tuesday, Nov 5, 2007
Having been forced to report on Ron Paul's record breaking donation drive yesterday, mainstream outlets seized the opportunity to emphasize the Guy Fawkes gimmick, that was used by grassroots organizers to draw attention to Paul's campaign, as a way of tacitly suggesting that the Congressman's message of freedom and limited government is synonymous with terrorism and anarchy.
A grassroots campaign unaffiliated with the official Paul campaign was the catalyst for a huge $4.2 million cash infusion yesterday, putting the campaign well on course to raise $12 million by the end of the quarter and bringing Paul close to being the top fundraiser among the Republican candidates.
The Following headlines, however, chose not to lead with this information and instead to firstly draw attention to the November 5th theme:
Ron Paul Raises $3.68 Million on Guy Fawkes Day - NY Times
Financial Fireworks for Texas Republican Presidential Candidate - Wired A penny for the guy, a hundred bucks for Ron Paul - CNet
Quote, "9/11 Firefighters and Family Members Plot Anti-Giuliani Ad Campaign By TAHMAN BRADLEY
Nov. 17, 2007 -
A group of 9/11 firefighters and victims' family members with eyes on derailing Republican Rudy Giuliani's presidential campaign is close to a decision on forming an entity that would run issue ads in key early nominating states."
911 attack was an inside job used to justify the passing through of Patriot Act and Mid-east war. Media played an important role in propaganda and cover up. So a "heroic Giuliani" trumpeted by media is as fake as the "911 attack". Those who live in New York and fought at the ground zero know much better than others that Giuliani isn't a hero.
Judy Giuliani did a good job to cover up the 911 truth. The Inside Group needs a loyal man to continue the cover up job and for more war in Mid-east. That's why he is picked up to be the front runner for next President.
Posts: 211 | Location: San Jose | Registered: 12-11-05
I just picked up on something. Giuliani has had a sex-change operation! Look closely at the third to the last sentence in kathaksung's post. Now remember that he has figured out most of the government's plots against its own citizens and how all the politicians are part of this scheme of lies. There is no other conclusion. Rudy was Judy! Of course, it makes sense. Before we elect a woman as president, we should try out the idea first. What better way to do so than to elect a man who was once a woman? Want more proof? Remember this line for Secret deodorant?
Strong enough for a man, Gentle enough for a woman
Hmmm.....Secret, huh? I guess it has been a secret, that is, until kathaksung outed Judy er, Rudy. And to make matters worse, Secret is made by none other than Procter & Gamble. Remember their logo, with the Mark of the Beast hidden in it? What more proof do you need?
We'd all be DOOMED, Doomed, I tell you, if it weren't for kathaksung's vigilencce.
Posts: 17223 | Location: Lincoln Place, Granite City, IL, USA | Registered: 06-03-02
Official poll used to put Ron Paul at the lowest. TV news used to focus on Rody and Romney but neglect Paul. Only they can't manipulate the money amount of campaign donation.
How ruling class control your mind by fake poll.
quote:
Republican Presidential Nomination Polling Data RCP Average 11/01 - 11/14
The vivid sample how Feds manipulate media to cheat public. When they can still put Paul at 4.7% in a fake poll.
The Feds could create a false flag attack such like 911. That's how they could rig a election to select their puppet Bush as president.
Media propaganda covers up 911 plot and led US into unjust war. It also justify a rigged election by fake poll. That's how Bush could be president for twice.
This poll is a vivid sample of how media direct public's mind with pre-concept psychological operation. Because they won't allow an anti-war candidate to win a campaign.
They can manipulate a randon number of 4.7% on Ron Paul but they can't manipulate the money amount. Ron Paul got most donation from military contributions
Quote, "Ron Paul leads ALL presidential candidates in monetary military contributions Percentages**:
49.5% Ron Paul 34.6% McCain 7.0% Romney 4.6% Giuliani 2.0% Hunter 2.3% Others
.
In addition to military support, Ron Paul also sets one-day GOP fundraising record. He hauled in more than 4.2 million on 11/5. That money came from grassroot voters, how many votes does it mean? Yet, the media always put him at the lowest poll number. Do you recognize how this country is manipulated?
------------- This is a covert totalitarian country. They select president by rigged election. (They control the voting office by intelligence) and justify the result by fake poll. (They manipulate public opinion by media)
Posts: 211 | Location: San Jose | Registered: 12-11-05
When the poll result is not to the favor of the host and they can't cover it up by a fake one, they simply cancel it. That's why Official poll used to put Ron Paul at the lowest. TV news used to focus on Rody and Romney but neglect Paul.
Quote, "SF Republican Establishment vs. Ron Paul
Posted by Lew Rockwell at December 5, 2007 08:21 AM
An on-scene report from Jerry Cullen: "The San Francisco Republican Alliance headed by Gail Neira held their pre election banquet at the Holiday Inn at Fisherman’s Wharf in San Francisco last evening, December 4th, 2007. The gathering was advertised as a gala affair of loyal Republicans to be followed by a straw poll to select the favorite Presidential Candidate. The featured speaker was Republican State Senator Sam Aanesta (CA 4th SD). The Senator treated the audience to an hour long election pitch for Fred Thompson that cured the insomnia of all in attendance. After endless delays of meaningless trivia the doors were opened to the late comers to the straw poll each of whom had paid $5 for admission. The flood of Ron Paul supporters entered the room to join an already substantial number of Ron Paul supporters that had attended the 'banquet'.
"A shocked Gail Neira in consultation with the Fred Thompson Northern CA Coordinator cancelled the straw poll vote offering a series of fraudulent, incomprehensible and incoherent reasons. The result was chaos as more than one hundred Ron Paul supporters objected to the outright deception. Neira’s ratings reached a level of unreality beyond description. Security was called to evict the peaceful if upset Ron Paul followers. When I asked that a picture be taken to attest to security attacking the 79-year-old man, security turned and disappeared.
"The San Francisco Republican Party has not seen energy and enthusiasm like that displayed by the Ron Paul supporters in many years, if ever. Yet instead of opening their arms to this wonderful opportunity to rebuild a failed organization with an army of young, vibrant and intelligent supporters. the San Francisco Republican Party pretends that all is well. Their attitude can best be exemplified by the passive presence of a Vice Chair of the SF Republican Party Central Committee who witnessed the entire event at the Holiday Inn in silence. Amazing!
"It is clear that Ron Paul’s message has achieved momentum and attracted substantial funds. Message, Money and Momentum are a powerful political force. The Ron Paul revolution is alive and well. No wonder that the opposition will resort to disgraceful tactics to stop the express."
I take a look at Ron Paul, & like any other candidate, I see things i like & things I disagree with.
I tend to think, whoever ends up in the White House will find that pulling out of Iraq is not as simple as it sounds. And that by making an abrupt exit would be a huge mistake.
Posts: 2277 | Location: Martinsville, IL | Registered: 06-03-02
Mainstream media, is a mind control tool works for the ruling class. They report news favored by ruling class and censor the news they disliked. Thus pour the unilateral information into your brain.
I read San Jose Mercury News Because it is the only "mainstream News" in the area. I have no choice. It reports a lot of news about Rody, Bush, Romney but rarely about Ron Paul. What I got about Ron Paul was a poll of GOP's candidates which put him at the lowest position - 4.7%. (in November)
Thanks to Internet, where I learned Ron Paul is a popular candidate. Different from other GOP nominates, he is anti-war and call for "take back America" by re-taking citizen's Constitutional right. This is accordance with the public opinion. Even media admits that most Americans are anti-war and disagree with Bush's policy. It may reflict at the fact that Ron Paul got the most campaign fund from military contribution and sets one-day GOP fundraising record. By common sense, he should be a leading candidate in GOP. Yet, he remains as the lowest in mainstream media. There is little words about Paul's opinion. If depends on Mercury News, I would know nothing about Paul except that "he is the most unpopular candidate in GOP."
On 12/4, San Francisco Republican held a straw poll meeting in Holiday Inn. Out of their expectation, a lot of supporters of Ron Paul attended the meeting. Obviously that was not the result the host wished to see. They canceled the vote. Of course the media kept silence on the news of aborted straw poll meeting.
On 12/11, Mercury News reported Giuliani had a campaign dinner on 12/10 in San Francisco. In an article extended to two pages, the paper reported Rudy's political opinion with the title "Giuliani tells S.F. supporters he's the Republican who can win state."
This is how the ruling class manipulate this country. They censor the information of real popular candidates and poured the news into your mind which they want you to know. They fake the poll to justify a rigged election. That's how Bush could be selected twice as president and guided US to unjust war.
Posts: 211 | Location: San Jose | Registered: 12-11-05
Iowa primary proves we need an honest and clear election system (1/4/08) Over 92% of Iowans are whites. But they choose an African American. Why? That means most Americans hates Iraq war and want their civil liberty back. Edwards and Hillary, though both are whites and experienced Deomcrats, they behaved more like a Bush's follower. Both voted for Patriot Act and approved the Iraq war Authorization Bill. How could we got this result? Because the Iowa Demo primary counts vote on attending people. It makes the election honest and clear and hard to be rigged. Why Ron Paul only got 10%? (He is the only one in GOP that anti Iraq war and is the only one meets major American's will) Because the Iowa GOP primary counts vote on ballots. Then who controls election office controls election result. They give you a number nobody can confirm. That's how Bush could be selected twice. --------------- This is a covert totalitarian country. They select president by rigged election. (They control the voting office by intelligence) and justify the result by fake poll. (They manipulate public opinion by media)
Posts: 211 | Location: San Jose | Registered: 12-11-05
Iowa primary proves we need an honest and clear election system (1/4/08)
Over 92% of Iowans are whites. But they choose an African American. Why? That means most Americans hates Iraq war and want their civil liberty back.
Edwards and Hillary, though both are whites and experienced Deomcrats, they behaved more like a Bush's follower. Both voted for Patriot Act and approved the Iraq war Authorization Bill.
How could we got this result? Because the Iowa Demo primary counts vote on attending people. It makes the election honest and clear and hard to be rigged.
Why Ron Paul only got 10%? (He is the only one in GOP that anti Iraq war and is the only one meets major American's will) Because the Iowa GOP primary counts vote on ballots. Then who controls election office controls election result. They give you a number nobody can confirm. That's how Bush could be selected twice.
--------------- This is a covert totalitarian country. They select president by rigged election. (They control the voting office by intelligence) and justify the result by fake poll. (They manipulate public opinion by media)
Posts: 211 | Location: San Jose | Registered: 12-11-05
Japanese law maker speaks of 911 that Americans' dare not to say
Quote, "Transcript Of Japanese Parliament's 911 Testimony Posted Jan 14, 2008
Below is a transcript of testimony in the Japanese Parliament that was broadcast live nationwide on NHK television. The Member of Parliament talking about 911 is Yukihisa Fujita from the Democratic Party of Japan. After the testimony Mr. Fujita says he got lots of phone calls from other members of Parliament thanking him for having the bravery to bring up 911 in Parliament. He also got one death threat.
The secret government's control of Japan is falling apart. A few weeks ago one of Japan's leading commercial TV networks also broadcast a 911 truth program during prime time. One other national network and several local networks have also broadcast such programs.
The people of Japan do not want to finance genocidal mass murderers any more.
Mr. Fujita:
First of all I would like to get all members of the committee to look at this panel and look at the pictures I have provided you with. This is concrete evidence in the form of photographs and other types of information. The first photograph has computer graphics attached to show how large the plane that hit the Pentagon was. A 757 is quite a large airplane with a width of 38 meters. So as you can see even though such a large plane hit the pentagon there is only a hole that is too small for the airplane. This is a photograph taken of firemen at work and you can also see there is no damage of the sort an airplane that large should make. I would also like you to look at the lawn in front and notice that there are no airplane parts on it. Let us now look at the third picture, which is also of the pentagon taken from a U.S. TV news report has captions that show the roof of the Pentagon is still intact. Again even though a huge airplane is supposed to have hit, there is not enough corresponding damage. Now let us move to the next photograph. Here is a photograph of a hole, as Minister Komura knows the Pentagon is a very strong building with many walls. Yet the airplane has pierced them. But as you know, airplanes are made of the lightest possible material. An airplane made of such light material could not make a hole like that. Next I would like to show a photograph of how the airplane hit the building. The airplane made a U-turn, avoiding the Defense Secretary's office and hitting the only part of the Pentagon that had been specially reinforced to withstand a bomb attack.
Also, in the middle of page five we have a comment from a U.S. airforce official. He says I have flown the two types of airplane used on 911 and I cannot believe it would be possible for someone who is flying one for the first time to be able to carry out such a maneuver. Also, as you know, they have not recovered the flight recorders from most of these 4 airplanes. Also, there were more than 80 security cameras at the Pentagon but they have refused to release almost all of the footage. In any case, as you have just seen there is no picture of the airplane or of its wreckage in any of these photographs. It is very strange that no such pictures have been shown to us.
Here is something said by a Japanese research team of officials from the fire department and the construction ministry. The interviewed a Japanese survivor who said that while she was fleeing there were explosions. This testimony appears in a report prepared with the aid of the construction ministry and the fire department. Now I would like you to see the following picture. Normally it is said that the twin towers collapsed because they were hit by airplanes. However, one block away from the twin towers is building number 7. It can be seen in the following map a block away from the WTC. This building collapsed 7 hours after the WTC buildings were attacked. If I could show you a video it would be easy to understand but take a look at this photograph. This is a 47 story building that fell in this manner (He drops and object to demonstrate). The building falls in five or six seconds. It is about the same speed as an object would fall in a vacuum. This building falls like something you would see in a Kabuki show. Also if falls while keeping its shape. Remember it was not hit by an airplane. You have to ask yourself if a building could fall in that manner due to a fire after 7 hours. Here we have a copy of the 911 commission report. This is a report put out by the U.S. government in July of 2004 but this report does not mention the collapse of the building I just described. It is not mentioned at all in here (he waves the book). FEMA also issued a report but they also fail to mention this building. Many people believe, especially after seeing the story about building number 7, that something is strange. Since this is an incident where many people died people think is should be investigated.
We are running out of time but I would also like to mention the put options. Just before the 911 attacks, ie on September 6th, 7th and 8th there were put options put out on the stocks of the two airlines United and American that were hit by hijackers. There were also put options on Merril Lynch, one of the biggest WTC tenants. In other words somebody had insider information and made a fortune selling put options of these stocks. The head of Germany's Bundesbank at the time, who is equivalent to the Governor of the Bank of Japan, said there are lots of facts to prove the people involved in the terror attacks profited from insider information. He said there was lots of suspicious trading involving financial companies etc prior to the attacks. The had of the Bundesbank was willing to say this much. I would like to ask the Finance Minster about these put options. Did the government of Japan know about this, and what do you think about this? I would like to ask Finance Minister Nukaga about this.
Keiichiro Asao:
I understand put options are a deal to sell stocks at a fixed price. In this case somebody must have had insider information to carry out such transactions because nobody could normally predict these airlines would have their planes hijacked. So, I believe this was certainly a case of insider trading.
. 
