Click here for AnswerPool.com Home page




Google

    AnswerPool.com  Hop To Forum Categories  News & Reference  Hop To Forums  Current Events    It's Our Money....Isn't It?

Moderators: Koz
Go
Post
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Site
Administrator
Picture of DorianGreyed
Posted
By Amit R. Paley
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, September 28, 2006; Page A01


BAGHDAD, Sept. 27 -- A $75 million project to build the largest police academy in Iraq has been so grossly mismanaged that the campus now poses health risks to recruits and might need to be partially demolished, U.S. investigators have found.

The Baghdad Police College, hailed as crucial to U.S. efforts to prepare Iraqis to take control of the country's security, was so poorly constructed that feces and urine rained from the ceilings in student barracks. Floors heaved inches off the ground and cracked apart. Water dripped so profusely in one room that it was dubbed "the rain forest."

"This is the most essential civil security project in the country -- and it's a failure," said Stuart W. Bowen Jr., the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction, an independent office created by Congress. "The Baghdad police academy is a disaster."

The report serves as the latest indictment of Parsons Corp., the U.S. construction giant that was awarded about $1 billion for a variety of reconstruction projects across Iraq. After chronicling previous Parsons failures to properly build health clinics, prisons and hospitals, Bowen said he now plans to conduct an audit of every Parsons project.

"The truth needs to be told about what we didn't get for our dollar from Parsons," Bowen said.

As top U.S. military commanders declared 2006 "the year of the police," in an acknowledgment of their critical role in allowing for any withdrawal of American troops, officials highlighted the Baghdad Police College as one of their success stories.

"This facility has definitely been a top priority," Lt. Col. Joel Holtrop of the Corps of Engineers' Gulf Region Division Project and Contracting Office said in a July news release. "It's a very exciting time as the cadets move into the new structures."

Complaints about the new facilities, however, began pouring in two weeks after the recruits arrived at the end of May, a Corps of Engineers official said.

The most serious problem was substandard plumbing that caused waste from toilets on the second and third floors to cascade throughout the building. A light fixture in one room stopped working because it was filled with urine and fecal matter. The waste threatened the integrity of load-bearing slabs, federal investigators concluded.

Phillip A. Galeoto, director of the Baghdad Police College, wrote an Aug. 16 memo that catalogued at least 20 problems: shower and bathroom fixtures that leaked from the first day of occupancy, concrete and tile floors that heaved more than two inches off the ground, water rushing down hallways and stairwells because of improper slopes or drains in bathrooms, classroom buildings with foundation problems that caused structures to sink.

Galeoto noted that one entire building and five floors in others had to be shuttered for repairs, limiting the capacity of the college by up to 800 recruits. His memo, too, pointed out that the urine and feces flowed throughout the building and, sometimes, onto occupants of the barracks.

"This is not a complete list," he wrote, but rather a snapshot of "issues we are confronted with on a daily basis (as recent as the last hour) by the incomplete and/or poor work left behind by these builders."

The U.S. military initially agreed to take a Washington Post reporter on a tour of the facility Wednesday to examine the construction issues, but the trip was postponed Tuesday night. Federal investigators who visited the academy last week, though, expressed concerns about the structural integrity of the buildings and worries that fecal residue could cause a typhoid outbreak or other health crisis.

"They may have to demolish everything they built," said Robert DeShurley, a senior engineer with the inspector general's office. "The buildings are falling down as they sit." - Washington Post
--------
Just who is Parsons? How much money is the US paying them?

Iraq: Parsons Corp. Wins $900 Million Contract

Reuters
March 30th, 2004

SAN FRANCISCO, March 30 - California's Parsons Corp., one of the most active U.S. companies in Iraq, said on Tuesday it won a contract worth up to $900 million from the U.S. military for security and justice work in Iraq.

The privately-owned engineering and construction company said the latest deal includes the restoration and construction of bases for the Iraqi security forces, police stations, border control stations, fire stations, courthouses and prisons.

The project for two years with three one-year options has a potential value of $900 million and is the second contract the Pentagon has awarded Parsons in a batch of $5 billion worth of heavy construction contracts funded by $18.6 billion appropriated by Congress to rebuild Iraq's infrastructure.

Parsons also is part of a joint venture with Worley Group of Australia performing up to $800 million worth of work to restore Iraq's northern oil infrastructure.

The company also is involved in a $1.8 billion infrastructure deal awarded in January by the U.S. Agency for International Development to engineering company Bechtel, a privately-held company also based in California.

Other lucrative Iraq business includes building military bases as well as a $1.5 billion contract Parsons obtained with the U.S. military for construction and engineering work in Iraq and other hot spots where the military is active.

Bidding for the latest batch of heavy-duty construction contracts was restricted to companies from nations that supported the U.S.-led effort to overthrow former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.
--------
During the past five years, according to Federal Elections Commission records, Parsons has given more than $600,000 to federal lawmakers including Republicans Tom DeLay, Dennis Hastert and David Dreier, and Democratic US Sens. Hillary Clinton and Dianne Feinstein, US Rep. Hilda Solis and, at roughly $10,000 per election cycle, Pasadena Congressman Adam Schiff.

Since 2001, Parsons has also spent about $1 million on lobbying efforts, according to documents filed with the US Senate Office of Public Records.

During a June 2004 interview with KCET-TV reporter Jeffrey Kaye, Parsons CEO James McNaulty, a 24-year Army vet who was a program director for the Pentagon’s “Star Wars” Strategic Defense Initiative Program, took exception to the term “profiteer.”

“I don't accept that, and I don't accept the connotation that we are somehow taking advantage of either the Iraqi people or our government,” said McNaulty. “Our employees, frankly, take pride in the fact that we are helping the Iraqi people and Iraq as a country re-establish their infrastructure and enable them to stand on their own two feet. It makes us feel good.” - Pasadena Weekly
--------
Top 100 Federal Prime Contractors -- 2004

63: Parsons Corp.
President/CEO: James McNulty, chairman and CEO;
Frank DeMartino, president and COO

Source: Washington Technology

Top 100 Federal Prime Contractors -- 2004

25: Parsons Corp. Top 100 Contributors List


2004 Total Contributions: $264,650

2004 Republican Contributions: $135,750

2004 Democrat Contributions: $128,900

2004 Contributions to George Bush: $17,950

2004 Contributions to John Kerry: $6,850

2004 PAC Contributions: $214,600

2004 Contributions to individual candidates: $50,050

2000 Total Contributions: $99,750

2000 Republican Contributions: $59,950

2000 Democrat Contributions: $38,800

2000 Contributions to George Bush: $2,000

2000 Contributions to Al Gore: $550

2000 PAC Contributions: $93,750

2000 Contributions to individual candidates: $6,000

2000 Soft Money contributions: $0

Source: Washington Technology
--------

I'd say they got a fine return om their investment. Invest about $2 million, get back a $1 billion contract, and you don't even have to put out quality work.
 
Posts: 16662 | Location: Lincoln Place, Granite City, IL, USA | Registered: 06-03-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond
Enthusiast

Picture of juanruiz
Posted Hide Post
I don't recall anyone arguing strenuously that the federal government has ever been circumspect in spending money.
 
Posts: 7507 | Location: Medieval Spain | Registered: 06-06-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond
Enthusiast

Posted Hide Post
"Holmes on Homes" in Iraq. But this building was the Top Priority in the Central Front in the War On Terror, which is part of the Struggle Of The Millenium. Shouldn't someone have kept an eye on it?
 
Posts: 7571 | Location: Canada | Registered: 06-03-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond
Enthusiast

Posted Hide Post
Yes. It ought to be built to stand at least as long as the Americans stay in Iraq. What's that? Only thirty or forty years ?
 
Posts: 7697 | Location: Newmarket, UK/ Antibes, S.France | Registered: 07-14-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond
Enthusiast

Posted Hide Post
I wonder how well-built the US's fortress/embassy/self-contained-town in Baghdad is going to be:

Asian Workers Trafficked to Build World's Largest Embassy
 
Posts: 7571 | Location: Canada | Registered: 06-03-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond
Enthusiast

Posted Hide Post
'In a troubling sign for the American-financed rebuilding program in Iraq, inspectors for a federal oversight agency have found that in a sampling of eight projects that the United States had declared successes, seven were no longer operating as designed because of plumbing and electrical failures, lack of proper maintenance, apparent looting and expensive equipment that lay idle...

...Curiously, most of the problems seemed unrelated to sabotage stemming from Iraq’s parlous security situation, but instead were the product of poor initial construction, petty looting, a lack of any maintenance and simple neglect...

...“What ultimately makes any project sustainable is local ownership from the beginning in designing the project, establishing the priorities,” Mr. Barton said. “If you don’t have those elements it’s an extension of colonialism and generally it’s resented.”'
Inspectors Find Rebuilt Projects Crumbling in Iraq

What a waste.
 
Posts: 7571 | Location: Canada | Registered: 06-03-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond Enthusiast

Posted Hide Post
It appears that we should train some Iraqi building inspectors before we train Iraqi policemen.
 
Posts: 7623 | Location: in the backwoods of North Carolina | Registered: 06-07-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
They could have just hauled some pre-fabricated structures in there for pennies on those wasted Millions.

Or, better yet, why didn't they just set up camp in one of the many pre-existing mansions they "liberated" from the Iraqis? Or, did they demolish them all?

Now, watch them pay Parsons again to tear it down and build it all over. I wouldn't doubt it, as that's typical bureaucratic thinking for you.
 
Posts: 362 | Location: USA | Registered: 11-05-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

    AnswerPool.com  Hop To Forum Categories  News & Reference  Hop To Forums  Current Events    It's Our Money....Isn't It?

© 2002-2008 AnswerPool.com



Visit DiscussionPool.com!