510. A nuclear attack in August plot (9/23/07)

9/6, under the briefing news about Rep. Paul Gillmor's death, Mercury News also reported: "Nuclear warheads flown between bases in error

A B-52 bomber was mistakenly armed with six nuclear warheads and flown for more then three hours across several states last week,.....
The plane carried Advanced Cruise Missiles from Minot Air Force Base, N.D. to Barksdale Air Force Base, La., on Aug 30."

Then in same internet article, I learned that in military procedure, nuclear weapons must be shipped on the ground in the continental US in case there is an accident.

Re: "9-11-2007- WHAT'S GOING ON?

September 11, 2007 at 09:58:57

Now we learn that on August 30th, six nuclear warheads were "accidentally" shipped by B-52 from Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota to Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana. (Five arrived, did one get "lost"? Or is someone unable to count?) This violates all military procedure, which requires that nuclear weapons always be shipped on the ground in the continental US, so that if there's an accident, a bomb detonation won't occur. It would take an order from the Commander-in-Chief to put nukes on a plane.

The warheads were reportedly fastened to cruise missiles, which have a range of 1500-2000 miles. Not enough to cross the Atlantic, but enough to hit cities in the US as part of a false flag operation. This scenario is being claimed by "military investigators" on the Hal Turner show, and is making its way around the internet. It's being said the plan was to hit 5 American cities with nuclear weapons over Labor Day weekend in order to install martial law. If so, we have been saved by the grace of God, operating through loyal American whistleblowers, who made the "accidental shipment" of nuclear warheads public."

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_carol_wo_070911..._2007__what_s_go.htm

If you are a regular reader of my journal, you know as early as 8/18 I have predicted that 8/31 to 9/3 would be the action day of the August plot.(the day when Bay Bridge closed) I also repeatedly alleged there would be false flag terror attack (likely dirty bomb attack or nuclear weapon attack) to distract the framed case. This news proves my allegation. The attack would be from the government insider not from Islamic terrorist. It also alerted me that I under-estimated the Feds. Their tactic is not distract but pre-distract.

In distract case, a framed drug case broke off. Suspects died in arrest or in custody. Then terror attack follows to distract, turns public attention away from the case. But the news of drug case would leave trace in some people's mind.

In pre-distract case, something bigger takes place in advance of the framed case. Next day, when people are in the peak of panic, any other news would be ignored. Or, most likely, there is no report on any other small news (small compare to a nuclear bombing, and there are six of them. You can imagine how many pages and times spent by media to cover up the scene of each bombed city) No one knows about the drug case. Pre-distract is a thorough censorship.

I have predicted 4/17 as action day of April plot. (The last day for file a tax return) There was a massacre in Virginia Tech which shocked the whole country on 4/16.

I have predicted 8/31 to 9/3 as action day of August plot. (Bay Bridge closed) There was an attempted nuclear bombing incident on 8/30. All planned one day before the main action day. So the pre-distract plays its utmost.

I think my continuous revelation soured the plot. If their plan went through, six US cities would have been destroyed, Feds would take over the states with Martial law. A framed drug case in California next day, would sink into oblivion.

If the plan went through, that B-52 would have been shot down after it released the missile. The crew, actually worked like a suicide bomber. They only deliver something to the order. They never know they were the sacrifice. The news of the "accident" of B-52, would have sink into the ocean of nuclear panic too.

That's why the bomb is not regular nuclear bomb. They were advanced cruise missiles armed with nuclear heads. All targets were pre-settled. They shoot automatically by the remote control command. At that time, I believe the TV would broadcast another tape from Bin Laden to claim a victory of Jihad. And Russian would admit they lost six nuclear bombs in their warehouse.

511. Seven most wanted cities by Feds (9/28/07)

In October plot last year, seven cities were targets.

On 10/9/06, North Korea had a nuclear test. (Manipulate N.Korea through China to push for a nuclear panic and justify the source of nuclear material used in dirty bomb.)

On 10/11, Lidle's small plane crashed to a sky-rise in New York. (To justify the terror attack method, that small plane's action is out of control.)

On 10/12, a warning of dirty bomb attack was posted in internet which claimed seven NFL football stadiums will be hit with radiological "dirty bombs".

Homeland Security Department said the threat was being viewed "with strong skepticism". The FBI also expressed doubt about the threat.

However in August plot this year, there is a strange coincidence that a news said Al Qaida targets at seven US cities. This time there was no doubt expressed.

Re: Al-Qaida Plans Nuclear
Attacks on 7 U.S. Cities
NewsMax Wires

Seasoned investigative reporter and former FBI consultant Paul Williams reveals the alarming potential for nuclear terrorism on U.S. soil and the sinister connections among organized crime, illegal immigrants, and al-Qaida.

Recently, FBI Director Robert Mueller, in an interview with NewsMax, confirmed Williams' main claim. Mueller said al-Qaida's paramount goal is clear: to detonate a nuclear device that would kill hundreds of thousands of Americans.

Williams maintains that al-Qaida is not content on blowing up one nuclear device or even simply a "dirty" nuke - but wants to explode real nuclear devices in seven U.S. cities simultaneously

http://w3.newsmax.com/a/dayofislam/?PROMO_CODE=34BE-1

Obviously Feds has 7 US cities as their most wanted. Then why there were only six nuclear missiles prepared in this operation? Because a B-52 can only hang 6 missiles in each of its wing. One wing must hang un-nuclear missiles to justify a security check has been done. So six was their utmost.

Re: "How warheads made an unplanned flight

By Joby Warrick and Walter Pincus, The Washington Post
September 23, 2007

WASHINGTON -- --

The airmen attached the gray missiles to the plane's wings, six on each side. After eyeballing the missiles on the right side, a flight officer signed a manifest that listed a dozen unarmed AGM-129 missiles. The officer did not notice that the six on the left contained nuclear warheads, each with the destructive power of up to 10 Hiroshima bombs."

Which are the most wanted cities of Feds? Two in October plot 2006 were Oakland and Houston. One of my sister (I think she is a murder target of the Feds) lives in Oakland. In August 2007 plot, Feds prepared a shut down of Bay Bridge (which connects Oakland and San Francisco). I think they planned a tunnel bombing for my sister so Oakland could exempt from a nuclear attack last month. Houston is a city one of my cousin lives. (Is my cousin a target too?) I'm sure it's a target because in Katrina case, Houston was the predicted landing spot of Hurricane Rita. And the Hurricane landing day was September 24, the action day of the plot.

The other two cities would be Washington DC and Boston, I think. The White House was said one target of the four planes in 9/11/2001. Only that plane crashed in mid-way. But to justify a war on Iran, to destroy Capital is a necessity. Boston has been in hit list in several terror case. In 1/20/2005, there was a Boston dirty bomb case. In late January 2007, there was an ad scare case in Boston. The ad box which could turn into bombing box appeared in 10 US cities. All planned by Feds, I allege.

Do you live in one of these cities?

512. Attempt dirty bomb attack on 9/14 (10/3/07)

There was a stand down order in Air force on 9/14/07. I think it was an immediate follow up to the soured 8/30 nuclear attack.

Quote, "ACC orders commandwide standdown Friday

By Bruce Rolfsen - Staff writer
Posted : Monday Sep 10, 2007 17:38:42 EDT

On Sept. 14, flight lines will be very quiet at Air Combat Command bases.
The entire command - about 100,000 active-duty airmen - is standing down training flights and many other operations as part of a command-wide safety day.

Command boss Gen. Ronald Keys ordered the Sept. 14 safety standdown in the wake of the Aug. 30 nuclear incident at Minot Air Force Base, N.D., in which six cruise missiles armed with nuclear warheads were loaded onto a B-52H and then flown to Barksdale Air Force Base, La., without anyone on the ground or bomber realizing the nuclear weapons were on the plane.

http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2007/09/airforce_airc...nd_standdown_070807/

I don't see there is anything can be done to improve the "mistaken loading of nuclear missiles" by a stand down order two weeks later. It only eroded the air defense of the US on that particular day. I remembered there was a similar stand down order on the day of 9/11/2001. The order, would open the American sky for another terror attack.

This time the terror attack would be a dirty bomb attack. I alleged in October plot of 2006, Lidle's air crash was used to justify that the dirty bomb attack would be done by small planes. The plot went soured. The plan is still there. Feds tried to use this plan again. They opened the sky for a terror attack on 9/14.

The 9/14 attack could replace the 8/30 nuclear attack and continue the big August plot.
1. 9/14 attack still would cause a nuclear panic Feds needed to distract a framed case and activate war on Iran.

2. The "Bin Laden option trade" could still go on planned process. The due date was in 9/21 and in the end of September (in European stock market).

3. The original plan on financial market could still be carried on. That was:

(1) Around 9/14, there was a financial crisis breaking off in UK. I think that was a procedure in August plot.
Re: "Fears grow for British economy as panic over Northern Rock spreads

Heather Stewart and Heather Connon
London Observer
Sunday September 16, 2007

US Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson flies in to London tomorrow to discuss the worsening global credit crisis with Chancellor Alistair Darling, as fears intensify that the lending squeeze could be the last straw for Britain's buy-now-pay-later economy.

Thousands of anxious customers queued outside branches of Northern Rock to withdraw their savings this weekend, ignoring calls for calm from Darling, after he helped broker an unprecedented emergency loan from the Bank of England to rescue the bank."

The crisis suddenly ended mysteriously. But if 9/14 attack went true, then situation would have been thoroughly different. Because the Little Rock crisis was designed as "the last straw for Britain's economy". European stock market would be hit heavily if UK economy collapsed.

(2) Federal Reserve meeting was at 9/18. If there was a 9/14 terror attack, Bernanky could go in opposite way by raise the interest rate with "consideration of inflation".

So the 9/14 attack still could fulfill the purpose of the original August plot: A terrorist bombing as first wave attack, followed by the second wave of financial crisis.

There was also a coincidence to the terror attack date and the resignation date of two evils.

1. Karl Rove's resignation day was 8/30, same day of nuclear missiles "mistakenly transferred" by a B-52". (8/30 attempt nuclear attack)

2. A.G. Gonzalez' resignation day was 9/14, same day when Air force had a "stand down" order. (9/14 attempt dirty bomb attack)
I have speculated that Rove's resignation related to the coming terror attack. As Gonzalez, I suspect DOJ is behind all that "warrantless surveillance" and the drug case they framed on me was always connected to the terror attack. He might have signed an order of unreasonable "search and arrest" before he left the office. Feds made use of their puppet to its utmost.


513. October plot 2007 (10/8/07)
Now we have a review on August plot.

1. In May, the so said opposing party Democrats suddenly withdraw their fighting against the Iraq war policy and released the extra fund requested by Bush. It indicates a plot of false flag terror attack combined with Iran war had been planned. The extra fund, was for Iran war, though in the name for surge.

2. In June, extra US troops were in Iraq. It was for Iran war.

3. A three month plan. (July to September) Marked with 8/30 nuclear missiles attack and Bay Bridge shut down for framed drug case (8/31 - 9/2) and the Bin Laden stock option trade (August to late September) When the nuclear missile attack was abandoned, there was a refill attempt of dirty bomb attack on 9/14.
4. In mid-September, when the August plot went soured, government pushed out a general to explain the surge, described it as a not successful, not failed mission. Because their final goal, is still a war on Iran. So the troops still has to stay there.

5. A new request of 140 billion by Pentagon is approved by the Senate. I think 100 billion is for military activity in Iraq and Afghanistan. The 40 billion, similar to the amount Bush requested for surge, is for Iran war. In addition to that, Bush wants another 50 billion this time. That amount, I think, is for war on Syria. Bush wants to finish the Mid-east road map before he leaving the White House.

For these war, another 911 alike terror attack is inevitable. So attempt of a dirty bomb attack will be tried repeatedly. The news for this month:

Attack on Iran Said To Be Imminent
By BENNY AVNI
Staff Reporter of the Sun
September 28, 2007

Yesterday's edition of Le Canard Enchaîné, a French weekly known for its investigative journalism, reported details of an alleged Israeli-American plan to attack Iran's nuclear facilities. The frontpage headline read: "A report sent to the Elysée - Putin tells Tehran: They're going to bomb you!"

Like most stories in the French paper, the article was based on unnamed sources who said that in order to reduce casualties, the attack against Iran is planned for October 15, the end of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

http://www.nysun.com/article/63561

Re: "U.S. Plans Biggest Terror Drill Ever
Three Fictional "Dirty Bombs" To Go Off In Portland, Phoenix And Guam
WASHINGTON, Oct. 3, 2007

The agency said the Oct. 15-19 exercise would be "the largest and most comprehensive" to date. "
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/10/03/national/main3323552.shtml

Months ago, Michael Chertoff had "gut feeling" about TWIN "dirty bombs" going off in Los Angeles AND San Francisco, so the drill in Oregon and Arizona has a connection to it. Among them, I think San Francisco is the main target.

As old tactic, there is another hurried travel for my family member. My brother and his wife, along with my uncle, will take a Panama cruise from 10/9-10/28. An 18 days cruise trip for only $600. To lure my relatives to such trip trap, Feds used to offer big bargain trip, sometimes free.

514. More for October plot 2007 (10/13/07)

1. Chen Shui-bian, President of Taiwan, flew to Marshall Islands on 10/12 for a visit. I have alleged he was a target in August plot (2007) when he was arranged in a visit to three South America countries. He used to be a chip of payment in US-China secret deal. It's easy to create an accident in a long trip.

2. On 10/11, White House announced that Bush would meet the spiritual leader of Tibet - Dalai Lama - on 10/16. The Congress also would award Dalai Lama a gold medal on 10/17. China protested US for the interference on internal affair of China. To create a hostile appearance to cover up a covert collaboration. It becomes a routine in secret deal.

3. On 10/13, Washington Post reported that two of Bush's most senior Cabinet members - Condoleezza Rice and Robert Gates - pitched an unusual new missile defense partnership to Russian President Putin, but they received a firm public rebuke . It also reported that Putin kept Gates and Rice waiting for more than a half hour before he met them. The event plays the same role as Russian sending long rang bombers to Guam and England in August plot. To show Russian is unfriendly with US. The purpose is to cover up the covert collaboration between the two countries.

It means Russian will justify the original source of the radioactive material used in dirty bomb attack. There is a possibility Russian will play a role of witness. I alleged in June 2002, former A.G. Ashcroft had made a secret deal with Russia, let Russian be a witness that Saddam planned a dirty bomb attack on US so to justify Bush's Iraq war. That is famous Padilla case. For Iran war, similar plot repeats. (see # 68. Ashcroft's revenge :Re. 9. Ashcroft in Moscow")

4. As for me, there is a new event. Yesterday was garbage collect day. My wife says our garbage bin was missing. She said a neighborhood told her to call the garbage company to get a new one. Since the area residents mostly, if not all, are agents and informants, and the garbage company is run by the Feds, nobody would take our garbage bin away except the Feds. They want us to have a new bin. What the trick they put in that new bin? I don't know. But tactic is old: to make an arrest by finding drug trace in the bin, I think.

5. E.M wave radiation. At night, when I was asleep, I was attacked by Gama ray. (I call it so though I don't know what kind of radiation exactly is it.) It penetrates metal plate. It hurts internal organ, especially kidney. There was warm feeling when they apply it on me. They used to shot the ray with sleep wave so the radiation could apply longer on victim without being felt. When I was awaken, there was a heavy feeling of kidney. The urine would be red. (bloody urine) It's a malicious tactic to murder under the cover up of "kidney failure".

To arrest by framed drug case, to eliminate by high tech. weapon, or to set up bomb traps... Feds do try their best.


515. Bay Bridge shutdown and Minneapolis bridge collapsing (10/18/07)

From June 2006 to September 2007, in 15 months, Bay Bridge was closed (or partly closed) for four times. All related to the alleged framed case.

1. My father fell and had a surgery in later May 2006. He was in critical condition then. There was an announcement for work on Bay Bridge at the week-ends of 6/4 to 6/5.

2. Bay Bridge closed on Labor Day (9/3-9/5/2006). It coincided with alleged 9/2 action day of September plot 2006. (see "433. 9/2 plot (9/5/06)") Combined with event happened in June, I realized that Feds would murder my parents, and force my sister to take Tunnel Bart in emergence visit. A terror attack would take place in tunnel.

3. Then on 4/29/2007, an oil tank crashed at highway 880 and burned down Highway 580 which happened to be the main exit of the Bay Bridge. It played the mission to close Bay Bridge partly. (see " 482. The collapse of Highway 580. (5/3/07)") Authority originally announced that the re-build of the highway would take six months. But they then finished the work in less than a month.

I think the burned down of Highway was a hurried plan after the failure of 4/17/2007 plot when I started to reveal 4/16 Virginia Tech massacre was done by Feds. But in May when a much bigger plot was made, Feds dramatically finished that highway re-construction.

4. In that much bigger plot, they closed the Bay Bridge on 8/31 to 9/3, planned a nuclear terror attack on 8/30, and a stock market harvest and Iran war as well.

Feds made the decision in May. Then hurriedly finished the burned down highway work. At same time, Democrats suddenly ended their fight against Bush in the House and released the Iraq war fund. That fund, was for Iran war.

In June, US troops increased in Iraq in the name of surge. Actually, it was for Iran war. On 6/30, a brief news said Bay Bridge would be closed on Labor Day.

In July, Putin was invited to Bush's private ranch in Main. I alleged a secret deal has been made. Russia would be witness of "Iran's ambition for nuclear weapon" to justify the coming Iran war. Then new President of France was invited to US for a vacation. Another secret deal has been made. France would be new ally in Bush's Iran war.

On August 1, the interstate 35W bridge in Minneapolis collapsed. Media made it a big news.

When I read the full pages news and picture in Mercury News on 8/2, I thought, it might be a cover up job for the shutdown of Bay Bridge. Really, when I turned to Local edition, a big article with a big title caught my eye. "Bay Bridge will be closed on Labor Day". A collapsing bridge made the shutdown of Bay Bridge full justified.

Interesting reference:

Quote, "1stmilitia PHILADELPHIA,

Posted: Aug 3, 2007 7:46 AM

We have received information across our newswires that indicates an Ultra-low Freqency Blast as reported by the Russian Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics in Irkutsk originated from Latitude: 45° 00' North Longitude: 93° 15' West at the precise moment, and locale, of a catastrophic collapse of a nearly 2,000 foot long bridge in Minneapolis, Minnesota. This is obviously the Interstate 35W Bridge spanning the Mississippi River. The Russian Military further stated that a calamity of this size could only have occurred with the use of an "acoustic" weapon which the U.S. military is "known to possess." Interestingly enough, Augsberg College has involved itself into research pertaining to acoustic weaponry and is located ONE MILE from Interstate 35W Bridge!! To further elucidate on the power of such weaponry we cite this CNN report;



Quote, 'ENGINEERS SAY MINNESOTA BRIDGE COLLAPSE SHOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED THE WAY IT DID *PIC*

Posted By: Guarded_Optimist
Date: Thursday, 9 August 2007, 12:08 a.m.

Bridge engineers Ted Galambos and Robert Ballerini say the Minnesota I-35W bridge should not have collapsed the way it did. They seem to have expected a situation similar to the Webber Falls, Oklahoma bridge collapse of May 26, 2002, where a barge hit the bridge, but only one localized section fell.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0708/01/bn.04.html

516. Iran war next stage (10/23/07)

In early October, there was a summit of Caspian Sea states. The leaders of other Caspian Sea states ruled out any military strikes on Iran from their region. Russian President Vladimir Putin also made clear to Washington on 10/16 that Russia would not accept military action against Iran.

Putin visited Iran in Mid October and met with Iran's supreme leader Khamenei on 10/16. Putin offered a special proposal to Khamenei. The special offer, must relate to a nuclear deal.

Recently, Russia didn't play friendly to Iran. U.N. Security Council has imposed limited sanction on Iran. Russia voted yes. In the project of Iran's first nuclear power plant, Russia delayed the construction and delayed the supply of fuel, attributed all these to payment problem. Iran denied the accusation, said payment were on time, that Russia was just bowing to West pressure.

In the crisis of July to September, (the plot of Iran war justifying by a false flag nuclear attack in US, marked with 8/30 accident of "mistaken loading nuclear missiles on a B-52") Iran felt the approaching war threat from the US and made a compromise by accepting U.N. nuclear inspection in July. It was the time Iran needs the help most. None of the Caspian sea states and Russia gave a word. Why do they suddenly change the direction of 180 degree now?

I think it is a plot continue to the 8/30 plot. After the false flag nuclear attack went soured, Feds set up another trap for Iran. The fishing pole is Russia, the bait is "to finish the construction of the nuclear power plant on schedule", possibly with the permission of "production of highly enriched uranium" which can be used in nuclear weapon. Once the fish bite that special offer, the war will break off. What Bush needs is a justification.

To push Iran to bite the bait, a group of swindlers play a soap opera. Bush threatens World War 3 if Iran goes nuclear, to make Iran think that it belongs to a group. (The word "World War" is particularly selected because it means there are two camps, not two states) Caspian Sea states and Russia made Iran feel it is supported by a group. To create a safe feeling for Iran to accept that special offer.

Whether the fish will bite the bait, we don't know. But one thing is sure: when wolf wants to eat a goat, it will always find a justification. Either it's for "WMD", for "democracy", or for "your security". When Bush asks for more money from Congress, it's not for maintenance of troops in Iraq. It's for Iran and Syria war. And American people must prepare for a "dirty bomb" attack from their own government.

quote:

My wife says our garbage bin was missing. She said a neighborhood told her to call the garbage company to get a new one. Since the area residents mostly, if not all, are agents and informants, and the garbage company is run by the Feds, nobody would take our garbage bin away except the Feds. They want us to have a new bin. What the trick they put in that new bin? I don't know. But tactic is old: to make an arrest by finding drug trace in the bin, I think.

I have to admit that it was very clever of the Feds not to do it the easy way and just drop the drugs in the old bin. Getting a new bin eliminates questions about the garbage company being by the garbage bin.

Just don't take any bridges or tunnels, Scotty.

No way, DG, we never know what the Feds may have in mind.

DG and Scotty,
I think you are both missing the more important issue here. It is not garbage cans or bridges, but the danger of being hit by a gama ray in your own bed.

quote:

E.M wave radiation. At night, when I was asleep, I was attacked by Gama ray. (I call it so though I don't know what kind of radiation exactly is it.) It penetrates metal plate. It hurts internal organ, especially kidney. There was warm feeling when they apply it on me. They used to shot the ray with sleep wave so the radiation could apply longer on victim without being felt. When I was awaken, there was a heavy feeling of kidney. The urine would be red. (bloody urine) It's a malicious tactic to murder under the cover up of "kidney failure".

The metal plate in my head is far too thick for gamma rays to penetrate. I'm safe.

quote:

Just don't take any bridges or tunnels, Scotty.

But,,,but,,I live on an island

You have a boat, Koz. (But watch out for enemy government subs!)

[QUOTE] [I think you are both missing the more important issue here. It is not garbage cans or bridges, but the danger of being hit by a gama ray in your own bed./QUOTE]

I wonder if aluminum foil (worn as a hat) would help?

quote:

I wonder if aluminum foil (worn as a hat) would help?

Sadly, no, Scotty.
Greater minds than ours, have looked into the effectiveness of the foil helmet:

Among a fringe community of paranoids, aluminum helmets serve as the protective measure of choice against invasive radio signals.[/Using a $250,000 network analyser, we find that although on average all helmets attenuate invasive radio frequencies in either directions (either emanating from an outside source, or emanating from the cranium of the subject), certain frequencies are in fact greatly amplified. These amplified frequencies coincide with radio bands reserved for government use according to the Federal Communication Commission (FCC). Statistical evidence suggests the use of helmets may in fact enhance the government's invasive abilities. We speculate that the government may in fact have started the helmet craze for this reason.

MIT study: On the Effectiveness of Aluminium Foil Helmets.

The problem that most people have with foil helmets is that they put the shiny side out. Yes, it looks better, but the dull side must be o the outside. The foil atoms on surface of the dull side are denser (hence, the common use of dull as a synonym for dense), and are harder to penetrate. I've conducted experiments using both sides of foil for hats and a commercial microwave, using lab rats and some of the children in the neighborhood*, and found that the shiny side lets in approximately 87% of not only microwaves, but radio waves, TV waves, gamma rays, and space zapper rays. The dull side, however, reflects 99.9913% of even the strongest rays. When I have personally used a helmet (dull side out), I have found that nothing enters my head, a fact that I am sure Scotty will attest to.


*The unfortunate incident with one of the children was not my fault. He neglected to indicate on the registration form that he had braces.

quote:

Sadly, no, Scotty.
Greater minds than ours, have looked into the effectiveness of the foil helmet:

Drat! Foiled again!

quote:

When I have personally used a helmet (dull side out), I have found that nothing enters my head, a fact that I am sure Scotty will attest to.

I wouldn't say that, DG.

DG If there was a mistake concerning the microwave ( which is not admitted),it was that you had the turntable on, not that the kid had braces.If the kid had kept still, a lot , if not all, of the radiation would have missed him because the beams don't fill the oven space (which is why there's a turntable). However, once he is on a turning table he is carried through all the beams unless he can find a cool spot and run at exactly the same speed as, and against the direction of, the turntable until he hears the ping and the turning stops.

Unfortunately a kid who gets into the oven in the first place is unlikely to be bright enough to work this strategy out for himself. In that case,still deny liability and blame the parents .

517. The California fire is an organized crime (10/28/07)

Quote, "With no new evidence, Fox continues to ask: Did al Qaeda burn California?

David Edwards and Nick Juliano
Published: Thursday October 25, 2007

For the second straight day, Fox News stood virtually alone in advancing thinly supported speculation to raise fears that the wildfires ravaging California are not the result of a confluence of arid heat and high winds but were set deliberately by al Qaeda terrorists bent on destroying America.

Fox & Friends, the conservative cable channel, was panned Wednesday for breathlessly reporting a sketchy, four-year-old FBI memo as if it offered new information linking America's enemies in the "Global War on Terror" with a plot to burn down southern California.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Fox_hypes_Qaeda_plotted_fires_theory_1025.html

One point I agree with Fox news is that the California fire was caused by arson. But I think the mastermind behind arsonist is Feds not Al Qaida.

1. Al Qaida is always used as scapegoat for every big case in recent years. 911 attack was done in the name of Al Qaida. (a lot of people now realize it was done by insiders to justify Mid-east war) The conflict in Iraq between Sunni and Shiite was provoked by Al Qaida. (killing innocent civilians by "suicide bombers" and bombing shrine mosques) A soured nuclear attack on US on 8/30 was also warned previously by HSD chief Chertoff and FBI director Mueller that Al Qaida would nuke US cities. So was this time.

2. Media is a manipulate tool of Feds. The base of this news came from FBI.

3. Though they could blame it for Al Qaida, one thing Al Qaida unable to do is to create a wild fire situation like this. The fire in Southern California is caused by arid heat and high winds. The technique to control climate needs a long time experiment and huge fund support. So far I haven't see any other country has the ability to do it except US. I have alleged in my case Feds used their climate weapon to create high wind, hurricane and heat. See heat: 424. An unprecedented heat wave (7/30/06), see wind : 345. hurricane, a tool to distract (9/27/05).

4. This was an organized arson case. From TV, several days ago, I caught a brief news that police had shoot dead an arsonist. It also said police were tracking 5 suspects in separate arson case. It used to be individual even if a wild fire was caused by arson. Five separate arson in a wild fire certainly is an organized crime. (consider there were more undiscovered arson in the case) Who has the power to do it?
5. Media censorship. The arson obviously played an important role in this California fire. I caught it from a brief news from TV. Later I tried to find this report from newspaper for detail. I couldn't find any, not a little bit.

Obviously it was censored by media. Someone doesn't want people connect the fire to arson despite the fact it was a big one. (Police even killed one suspect.)

6. Motive. I think it is the continuation of the elimination plot. The attempt to finish the plot was so eager that the plan goes one after another.

* 8/31-9/3. Bay Bridge shut down. (marked with 8/30 B-52 nuclear missiles accident)

* 9/14. Air operation stand down. (an attempt of dirty bomb attack)

*10/15 - 10/19. A biggest ever terror drill for three Fictional "Dirty Bombs" To Go Off In Portland, Phoenix And Guam.

* 10/21 Sunday. Alleged dirty bomb attack in Great Mall, Milpitas. My sister and my parents came to my house. My sister asked me if there was a McDonald nearby