Diamond Enthusiast

|
|
| |
| Posts: 7707 | Location: in the backwoods of North Carolina | Registered: 06-07-02 |    |
|
Platinum Enthusiast
|
quote: Originally posted by FredPuli: What inquiry was there concerning Pearl Harbor? What conclusions were drawn ? Who was held to blame? If ever there was a case of honest innocence that was it. What was said about the intelligence or lack of it ?
There were plenty in the US government who were convinced that war with Japan was inevitable -- we had been on a collision course with them in China for years, and Americans were already serving with the Chinese military to resist the Japanese invasion of China long before Pearl Harbor. There were also plenty in the War Department who suspected that Pearl Harbor would be the target of a Japanese attack. That's why, although the US navy had been increasing the strength of its Pacific fleet for several years, we had not a single aircraft carrier within thousands of miles of Pearl Harbor in December, 1941 -- they had all been pulled back to San Diego. So while the attack was a surprise in the tactical sense, of catching the defenders unprepared to mount much of defence, in any strategic sense it was not, as the actual damage to the US military apparatus was relatively unimportant. Battleships were already pretty much obsolete, as evidenced by the shipbuilding priorities of both the US and Japan, and the shape of the naval battles of the war in the Pacific. Alan Moore
|
| |
|