Click here for AnswerPool.com Home page




Google

    AnswerPool.com  Hop To Forum Categories  News & Reference  Hop To Forums  History    Civil War.. constitutional?

Moderators: Koz
Go
Post
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Posted
Was President Lincoln constitutionally supported by preventing the succession of the Southern States?
 
Posts: 27 | Location: U.S. | Registered: 06-09-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Prothero>
Posted
No - in fact one of his problems was solved when the south fired on Fort Sumter. Had they not, many of the northern states and perhaps the people might have insisted on state's rights, though Lincoln might have figured out another justification.
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Diamond Enthusiast
Winner, AP's First Annual Chili Cook-off


Picture of dogspit
Posted Hide Post
One argument against Lincoln is that the Declaration of Independence announced a lawful secession by the colonies from Great Britain based on the right of the people to change or abolish their form of government. It is thus made apparent that the Declaration established that the right of secession is among the inalienable rights of men. The Declaration is therefore one of the best arguments against legal justification for a war against secession. It was adopted by representatives of the thirteen colonies and declared that those colonies had become "Free and Independent States."
 
Posts: 12696 | Location: "Cactus Patch" Arizona | Registered: 06-03-02Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

    AnswerPool.com  Hop To Forum Categories  News & Reference  Hop To Forums  History    Civil War.. constitutional?

© 2002-2008 AnswerPool.com



Visit DiscussionPool.com!