Diamond Enthusiast

|
1)How do we know that any given man or woman captured has committed barbarities? Or do we beat them all on the 'principle' that they must be guilty of something otherwise they couldn't be captured? 2) Logically they must, by that reasoning, have at least agreed to kill American soldiers or innocent civilians and may even have been on the way to doing so. The penalty for conspiring to murder could be death. So why then do we not put all such captives to death,then and there or later, without trial ? Or is that going too far? If so, why is it going too far?
By the way this argument is what Saddam's defence is to killing over a hundred people in a town where someone tried to assassinate him viz. that these people all wanted his death and agreed that ought to happen, so when there was an attempt they could all be put to death, without more than an 'investigation',with no formal trial, as conspirators to assassinate the head of state.
|
| |
| Posts: 7661 | Location: Newmarket, UK/ Antibes, S.France | Registered: 07-14-02 |    |
|