Site Administrator

|
I can't give you any figures, David, but the cost of pumping water up 500 feet alone might be more than the cost of running an air conditioner.
Another way to cool the air, one that is much cheaper than what you suggest, is simply a long duct running under the ground at about a 5' depth. Drawing air in near ground level (under trees or bushes), and then allowing the ground temperature to cool the air along the length of the duct would give you an unlimited supply of air near 65°F. You could draw the air into a basement and circulate it throughout the house, or, by insulating ductwork, bring it into the house at the top, and allow gravity to circulate the air downward. Your only continuing cost would be the cost or running a good sized intake fan. (Naturally, there are more details than I mention here, but I'm sure you understand the basic idea.) Your initial cost for this would also be significantly less than what you are suggesting.
If I remember correctly, Thomas Jefferson built his house over a cave and used the cool air from the cave to cool his house.
The earth duct could also help out in the winter if it was deep enough. The cold air would be warmed as it travels through the duct, and the burden of warming the air would be less on a furnace.
Both for heating and cooling, this method also also fresh air to be brought into the house.
|
| |
| Posts: 16552 | Location: Lincoln Place, Granite City, IL, USA | Registered: 06-03-02 |    |
|
Diamond Enthusiast


|
I am no mechanical engineer but here are the problems to look at first:
You need to consider the delta of temperatures involved and The heat gain or cooling loss of the space and it is critical to examine the actual dimensions rather than theoreticals.
The idea that a tower 500' tall could be cooled by a coil at the top of the tower alone is flawed. "Stack effect" is the natural tendency for air to flow up a shaft or tall space. You need to distribute the cooling evenly to achieve the best results.
You are looking at evaporative cooling systems. Using a mechanism similar to a glass sweating or the human body sweating is how many passive cooling systems work.
I think the issue is that it is generally difficult and expensive to cool but cheap to blow. Cooling is made more efficient by increasing air exchanges. You have to consider heat gain of a space and then consider than you'd have to increase the delta of your cold air considerably to get the desired results without mechanical fans (passive or electric) and you could easily reduce the delta between your cold source and the volume to be cooled by introducing mechanical venting to assist the flow.
Check out the chimney effect or stack effect... cold air does sink but sometimes natural convection fights this. A tall space would not behave as you might expect just thinking in terms of simple physics - convection complicates it all a bit.
Hope something here helps... this is not my strongest suit but since I work on high rises I do see how air flows and we most assuredly could never cool from top down without very powerful blowers.
Cooling towers used in the southwest are a good thing to google - deep shafts allow cold air from the bottom to flow up and in general openings off the shaft will assist in passively cooling spaces around.
|
| |
|