|
|
|
Go 
|
Post 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Gold Enthusiast

|
quote: I don't and can't put anything on Homework Help ( who the heck has homework on English law?) so I raise the question here.
I understand that only approved people can ANSWER questions on homework help. But I thought anyone could ASK a question on there without registering? Hence the spam.(Docrick has registered). But I just tried seeing what would happen if I asked a question, and it says I have to register.  So what's the situation? Do people have to register to get help there?
|
| |
| Posts: 2216 | Location: Ontario, Canada | Registered: 10-27-06 |    |
|
Diamond Enthusiast

|
I've only just got the joke . He's a chiropractor calling himself 'Rick' as in 'I'm in agony.I've ricked my back!' or, better, 'I've got a rick in my back'  I still think the 'carrots' line was better  P.S. I can post a question there? Right, I've got a great homework question about the rule in Foss v Harbottle...
|
| |
| Posts: 7694 | Location: Newmarket, UK/ Antibes, S.France | Registered: 07-14-02 |    |
|
Diamond Enthusiast

|
quote: Originally posted by dance girl: quote: Originally posted by FredPuli: P.S. I can post a question there? Right, I've got a great homework question about the rule in Foss v Harbottle...
No  dg. I understood the rule once , for all of the three hours it took to sit an exam about it. Would have been indefensible for me to forget the details.After all, the case was in 1842, so it must have been brand new when I did the exams 
|
| |
| Posts: 7694 | Location: Newmarket, UK/ Antibes, S.France | Registered: 07-14-02 |    |
|
Diamond Enthusiast

|
quote: Originally posted by dance girl: Ahhh..then R. v. Dudley and Stephens (1884) would have been far more meaty, I'm sure.
Nice.The rule of the Bar is 'dog eats dog'.We nearly got them acquitted by analogy,arguing that the rule of the mariners was 'seadog eats seadog'. Further, and in the alternative, that 'seadog eats mere pup', a raw cabin boy (or 'fruit de mer tartare', as the French say),made no offence, being a neat application, by extension, of the principle de minimis non curat lex 'the law does not concern itself with trifles'
|
| |
| Posts: 7694 | Location: Newmarket, UK/ Antibes, S.France | Registered: 07-14-02 |    |
|
Diamond Enthusiast

|
quote: Originally posted by juanruiz: quote: 'the law does not concern itself with trifles'
They aren't into dessert?
It is.'Fruit de mer tartare' was regarded as a a trifle, for the argument, but the law always ensures that everyone gets their just desserts 
|
| |
| Posts: 7694 | Location: Newmarket, UK/ Antibes, S.France | Registered: 07-14-02 |    |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© 2002-2008 AnswerPool.com
Visit DiscussionPool.com! |